论受众预期与司法裁判的契合度不足及实践应对  

On the Inadequate Compatibility between Audience Expectations and Judicial Judgments and the Countermeasures

作　　者：叶小兰[1] YE Xiaolan(School of law,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou,362021,China)

机构地区：[1]华侨大学法学院,泉州362021

出　　处：《现代法学》2024年第2期103-120,共18页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：新修辞学的受众理论表明,司法裁判是一种受约束的理性论证过程,裁判者要考虑受众的预期并反过来修正自己的说理论证,增强裁判可接受性。实践中,受众预期和司法裁判结果之间存在契合度不足现象,因而对司法裁判可能形成微观与宏观的诸多影响,既在个案裁判中直接影响当事人的诉讼策略及公众对案件的评判,乃至影响法官的考核,也在宏观上影响法治社会中公众对司法活动的整体评价。基于对受众预期的重视,法官在完成司法审判活动及作出裁判的过程中,不仅要预测性地思考如何说服案件当事人,还要考虑如何让判决结果尽量为其他旁观者理解和接受,在法律制度既定的情况下基于司法活动本质要求探索前瞻性应对机制。The audience theory shows that judicial adjudication is a constrained rational demonstration process,the referee should consider the expectations of the audience and modify his reasoning and argumentation in turn to enhance the acceptability of the judgment.In practice,there is a phenomenon of insufficient alignment between audience expectations and judicial rulings,which not only directly affects the litigant's strategy and the public's judgment on the case,but also affects the judge's assessment,and,also affects the overall evaluation of judicial activities by the public in a rule of law society at a macro level.In the process of completing the judicial trial activities and making the judgment results,the judge should not only think about how to persuade the litigants,but also consider how to make the judgment results understood and accepted by other bystanders as much as possible,and explore forward-looking response mechanisms based on the essential requirements of judicial activities under the established legal system.

关 键 词：新修辞学 司法裁判 受众预期 可接受性 法律论证 

分 类 号：DF03[政治法律—法学理论]