中国式现代化的“起点”考辩  

A Multi-dimensional Discussion on the “Starting Point”of Chinese Path to Modernization

作　　者：李辽宁 LI Liaoning(School of Marxism,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610207,Sichuan,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学马克思主义学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第2期3-14,共12页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大项目“推动青年理想信念教育常态化制度化研究”(20ZDA054)。

摘　　要：起点关涉事物发展的源头,对于考察事物的全过程具有基础性意义。学界对中国式现代化的“起点”问题争议颇多,主要有“新时代起点说”“改革开放起点说”“新中国成立起点说”“中国共产党成立起点说”“五四运动起点说”“洋务运动起点说”“鸦片战争起点”说。之所以出现这些分歧,是因为混淆了“中国式现代化”与“中国的现代化”这两个核心概念。通过概念辨析可知,中国式现代化的历史起点应该是“新中国成立”。原因在于:从实践来看,中国式现代化是在“新中国成立”之后才开启的;从党的领导人的经典论述来看,中国式现代化的历史起点是“新中国成立”;从党的文献来看,中国式现代化的历史起点还是“新中国成立”。The starting point,concerning the origin of entities,is fundamentally significant for examining the whole process of events.The academic circle has seen many controversies as for the starting point of Chinese path to modernization,namely,the new era,the reforming and opening to the world,the founding of People's Republic of China,the founding of the Communist Party of China,the May 4th Movement,the Self-strengthening Movement in the latter half of the 19th century,and the Opium War.The divergence stems out of the confusion between the two core concepts of “Chinese Path to Modernization”and “China's Modernization”.It is maintained that the starting point of Chinese path to modernization should be the founding of the new China.Seen from the practice,Chinese path to modernization was launched after the founding of People's Republic of China.The same conclusion can be drawn when we refer to the classic statements of the Party leaders and the documents of the Party.

关 键 词：中国式现代化 中国的现代化 逻辑起点 历史起点 

分 类 号：D61[政治法律—政治学]