检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段彩彬[1,2] 周会 姜宇 朱红阳 王彤[1] 黄馨慧[1] 蹇东伟 DUAN Caibin;ZHOU Hui;JIANG Yu;ZHU Hongyang;WANG Tong;HUANG Xinhui;JIAN Dongwei(Students Affairs Division,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China;Psychology School,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,Liaoning Province,China;Dean's Office,Liaoning Finance Vocational College,Shenyang 110122,China)
机构地区:[1]沈阳农业大学学生处,沈阳110866 [2]辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁大连116029 [3]辽宁金融职业学院教务处,沈阳110122
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2024年第5期452-457,共6页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L20CSZ006)。
摘 要:目的:考察自我威胁启动下,不同类型高自尊大学生对攻击性词语的注意偏向特点。方法:选取650名大学生,通过外显自尊量表(SES)选出高自尊被试。然后,通过内隐自尊测验(IAT)筛选出不同类型高自尊(脆弱型、安全型)组各43人。每组分别参加不同难易程度的瑞文标准推理测验(SPM)完成自我威胁启动,然后完成空间线索实验。当线索无效时,根据两组对攻击性词语的反应时与中性词语的反应时差值(RTI)的变异程度,获得注意偏向特点。结果:在高自我威胁启动下,脆弱型高自尊组RTI值高于安全型高自尊组(P<0.01);在低自我威胁启动下,脆弱型高自尊组和安全型高自尊组的RTI值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:相较于安全型高自尊,脆弱型高自尊更易受自我威胁的影响,其在高自我威胁启动下,注意偏向表现为注意固着。Objective:To investigate the characteristics of attention bias to aggressive information under self-threat priming in college students with different types of high self-esteem.Methods:A total of 650 college students were selected,and high self-esteem participants were selected through the Self Esteem Scale(SES).Then,43 partic-ipants were selected from different types of high self-esteem(fragile and safe)groups through the Implicit Associa-tion Test(IAT).Each group participated in Raven′s Standard Progressive Matrices(SPM)with different difficulty levels to complete self-threat priming,and then completed the spatial cue experiment.When the cue was invalid,the attention bias was obtained according to the variation of the reaction time difference(RTI)between the subjects′re-sponses to aggressive words and neutral words.Results:The RTI values of the fragile high self-esteem group were higher under high self-threat priming than that of the secure high self-esteem group(P<0.01).Under low self-threat priming,there was no significant difference in RTI values among different types of high self-esteem groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Fragile high self-esteem group are more likely to develop attention bias towards aggressive words under high self-threat priming than that of secure high self-esteem group.
关 键 词:脆弱型高自尊 安全型高自尊 自我威胁启动 注意偏向
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30