刑事庭前会议制度纂修的检视——以2021年《刑诉法解释》为视角  

Review of the Revision of Pretrial Conference System in Criminal Procedure:A Study of Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Law 2021

作　　者：张斌 罗高洋 ZHANG Bin;LUO Gaoyang(Criminal Law School,Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an 710122,China)

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院,陕西西安710122

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2024年第1期77-86,共10页Journal of Henan Police College

基　　金：陕西省社科基金项目“现实审视与理论解构:我国刑事辩护有效性研究”(2020E22);陕西省教育厅重点项目“我国刑事争点整理制度研究”(20JZ096)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：2021年《刑诉法解释》再次修订刑事庭前会议制度。删除“普通程序审理刑事案件”与“申请排除非法证据”,优化了刑事庭前会议的适用范围和条件。调整“程序性事项”和“庭后可以处理”,重置了刑事庭前会议的程序性裁决机制,使之呈现出裁量性和事后性特征。删除“争点整理”的表述,以控辩双方“对证据材料有无异议”和是否“达成一致意见的事项”的形式弱化了刑事庭前会议的争点整理机制。以“明显事实不清、证据不足”为由建构庭前建议撤回起诉机制,实为刑事庭前会议本体功能的不当延伸,可能成为控审冲突新的风险点。The Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Law 2021 once again amended the pretrial conference system in criminal procedure.By removing the provisions on"ordinary procedure for trying criminal cases"and"application to exclude illegal evidence,"it optimized the scope and conditions of the pretrial conference.Adjustments made to"procedural matters"and"matters that can be dealt with after the court session"reset the procedural decision-making mechanism of the pretrial conference,demonstrating discretionary and retrospective features.The deletion of the expression"sorting out issues"weakened the mechanism for sorting out issues in the pretrial conference by presenting issues of whether the prosecution and defense have objections to the evidence and whether they have reached consensus in the form.The establishment of the pretrial suggestion to withdraw prosecution based on"obvious unclear facts and insufficient evidence"is an inappropriate extension of the main function of the pretrial conference and may become a new point of conflict between the prosecution and the court.

关 键 词：刑事庭前会议 庭前程序性裁决 庭前争点整理 庭前建议撤回起诉 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]