执行时效的适用对象范围研究  

Study on the Applicable Object Scope of the Execution Limitation

作　　者：徐小淇 XU Xiaoqi(Law School,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期91-97,共7页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：我国现行法规并未直接言明执行时效的适用对象范围,导致实务中不同法院对于《民法典》第196条所涉情形能否适用执行时效的问题持不同观点。《强制执行法(草案)》第15条规定了执行时效的适用规则,并将执行时效与诉讼时效直接联系起来,但该条的规范对象是否涵盖执行时效的适用范围存在解释空间。为此,有必要澄清执行时效作为执行阶段的消灭时效的根本性质,明确诉讼时效与执行时效共同构成对请求权的时效限制体系,并在此基础上确认执行时效的适用对象范围与诉讼时效相一致,不包括《民法典》第196条所涉情形。The current regulations in our country don't directly specify the applicable scope of the enforcement prescription.As a result,different courts have different views on whether the circumstances mentioned in Article 196 of the Civil Code can be applied to the enforcement prescription.Article 15 of the Enforcement Law(Draft)stipulates the applicable rules of the enforcement prescription and directly links the enforcement prescription with the limitation of action.However,there is still room for interpretation whether the normative object of this article covers the scope of application of execution limitation.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the fundamental nature of the prescription of execution as the prescription of elimination in the execution stage,and make clear that the prescription of action and the prescription of execution together constitute the limitation system of the right of claim.On this basis,it is confirmed that the scope of applicable object of executionprescription is consistent with prescription of action,excluding the situation mentioned in Article 196 of the Civil Code.

关 键 词：执行时效 消灭时效 强制执行法 

分 类 号：D925.18[政治法律—诉讼法学]