个人信息保护刑事附带民事公益诉讼的检视和完善——基于157份裁判文书的实证分析  

Personal Information Protection Criminal Incidental Civil Public Interest Litigation Review and Improvement:an Empirical Analysis Based on 157 Judgments

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:戈治文 徐瑞 GE Zhi-wen;XU Rui(School of Law,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 102400,China)

机构地区:[1]北京理工大学法学院,北京102400

出  处:《宜春学院学报》2024年第2期29-33,88,共6页Journal of Yichun University

摘  要:数字时代个人信息兼具个体和社会属性,该保护领域已由个人控制转向社会协同共治,具有寻求公益诉讼保护以解决结构性困境的迫切需求。刑事附带民事公益诉讼具有区别其他公益诉讼的独特实体和程序性价值,在程序治理体系中的重要性逐渐提升。基于司法大数据的微观检视,相关司法实践尚面临起诉主体范围狭窄、诉讼请求选择单一和赔偿资金管理不明等具体规范阙短之难题。为优化制度设计,我国应当着力拓宽该制度领域多层次的主体范围,探索多元化的诉讼请求类型,并健全规范化的资金管理机制,以回应纾解信息化时代个人信息保护困境。Personal information has both individual and social attributes in the digital age.And the field of protection has shifted from individual control to collaborative social governance,with an urgent need to seek protection in public interest litigation in order to resolve structural dilemmas.Civil public interest litigation incidental to criminal proceedings has unique substantive and procedural values that distinguish it from other public interest litigation,and its importance in the procedural governance system is gradually increasing.Based on the micro-examination of judicial big data,the relevant judicial practice is still faced with the problem of narrow scope of prosecution subjects,single choice of litigation claims and unclear management of compensation funds and other specific norms.In order to optimize the system design,China should make efforts to broaden the scope of multi-level subjects,explore diversified types of claims,and improve the standardized fund management mechanism,so as to respond to the dilemma of personal information protection.

关 键 词:个人信息保护 刑事附带民事公益诉讼 起诉主体 诉讼请求 赔偿资金 

分 类 号:D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象