检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卞建林[1] 肖峰[1] Bian Jianlin;Xiao Feng
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《法学杂志》2024年第2期27-45,共19页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:随着我国犯罪结构发生显著变化,轻罪成为犯罪治理的主要对象。遗憾的是,我国现行刑事诉讼法并未建立与轻罪治理相关的审前程序分流制度,实践中仍按照既往的重罪治理模式处理案件,引致诸多弊端。通过比较考察发现,审前程序分流在世界范围内存在广泛的理论共识与制度设置。我国审前程序分流制度的构建有其内在的理论逻辑、实践逻辑以及政策逻辑,但仍面临理念认识不足、侦查阶段程序分流缺失以及起诉阶段程序适用受限三重障碍。因此,结合此次刑事诉讼法再修改,可探索从审前程序分流的理念更新、制度完善以及加强监督制约机制等方面因情施策,实现轻罪案件审前程序分流转处的体系化与精细化。With the significant changes in the structure of crime in China,misdemeanors have become the main target of crime management.Regrettably,China's current Criminal Proce-dure Law has not established a pre-trial diversion system related to misdemeanors,and in prac-tice,cases are still handled in accordance with the previous mode of felonies,which has led to many drawbacks.Comparative study reveals that there is a broad theoretical consensus and insti-tutional setup for pre-trial diversion in the world.The construction of China's pre-trial proce-dural diversion system has its inherent theoretical logic,practical logic and policy logic,but still faces the triple obstacles of insufficient conceptual understanding,lack of procedural diversion at the investigation stage,and limited application of procedures at the prosecution stage.Therefore,in combination with the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law,we can explore the updating of the concept of pre-trial procedural diversion,the improvement of the system,as well as the strengthening of the supervision and control mechanism and other aspects of the situation,in or-der to achieve the systematization and refinement of the pre-trial procedural diversion of misde-meanor cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7