科学化作为方法“何以可能”与“何以可为”--从民国时期科学对中医的改造谈起  

Scientification as a Method“Why Is It Possible”and“What Can Be Done”:Discussing the Transformation of Traditional Chinese Medicine by Science During the Era of the Republic of China

作　　者：张兴 ZHANG Xing(History College of Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学历史学院,芜湖241000

出　　处：《中医药文化》2024年第2期170-177,共8页Chinese Medical Culture

摘　　要：科学化作为改造中医的方法,提出了“何以可能”与“何以可为”两个问题。前者是回答中医为何接受科学的改造,后者则是讨论科学对中医改造的可行性。民国时期,在“科学化”的推动下,中医走向改造之路。通过探究发现,长期流行的“废医论”、1929年的“废止中医案”以及民国官方对中医的规制,使科学对中医的改造成为可能。有关科学改造中医的可行性问题,民国学界呈现出三种观点:不须科学化、可以科学化以及不可科学化。虽然这三个观点各有道理,但都存在缺陷,始终无法达成共识,其根源是科学观的差异与片面性导致的。Scientification as a method of transforming Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)poses two key questions:“Why is it possible?”and“What can be done?”The former seeks to answer why TCM should accept transformation through science,while the latter discusses the feasibility of using scientific methods to reform TCM.During the Republican Era driven by the push of“Scientification”,TCM was on the way to reform.The paper,it is found that the long-popular“abolishment theory”,the“old medicine abolition act”in 1929 and the official regulations of the Republic of China on TCM make it possible for science to reform TCM.Regarding the feasibility of the scientific transformation of TCM,the academic circles in the Republic of China presented three views:unnecessary scientification,scientification,and impossible scientification.Although these views are reasonable,they all have defects and cannot reach a consensus.The root cause is the difference and one-sidedness of their scientific views.

关 键 词：中医科学化 民国时期 改造 科学观 

分 类 号：R2-092[医药卫生—中医学]