《史记》《汉书》比较研究的目录学史问题补述--兼谈二书比较之疑难考察的研究方法问题  

A Supplementary Note on the Bibliography History Problems in the Comparative Study of Historical Records,and History of the Han Dynasty-Together with a Discussion of the Methodological Difficulties in the Comparative Examination of Two Books

作　　者：杨胜强 YANG Shengqiang(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350007,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学文学院,福州350007

出　　处：《渭南师范学院学报》2024年第4期27-38,共12页Journal of Weinan Normal University

摘　　要：新中国成立以来,诸本《史记》著录索引已有专列“史汉”部,或未列“史汉”部却载存相关书目的现象,值得马班异同研究者关注。梳理诸本“史汉”部,并回顾学术史可以发现,目录专著中始列“史汉”部者,当为民国郑鹤声《正史汇目》,而最早摭入“马班异同评”的专科目录者,恐是宋人高似孙《史略》,但郑、高二书均未得到学界应有的评定。“史汉”部所标“史汉”,或非《史记》《汉书》对比研究的相关书目,故于治目录者理当辨清。另外,二书比较之疑难考察的研究方法,不可拘泥于二书比较之疑难考察的研究史,应熟稔研究史而跳出研究史,回归于原典以重新辨清路向。Since the founding of new China,the indexes to many annotations of History Records,have been categorized into the section of“History in Han Dynasty”and the section of some related titles existing but without listed in“History in Han Dynasty”,a phenomenon that deserves the attention of researchers who focus on the similarities and differences of Ma Ban.A review of the section of“History in Han Dynasty”and the history of scholarship reveals that the first catalogue monograph listed in it is the ROC version of Zheng Hesheng’s Collection of Zheng Shi,while the earliest one included in a specialist catalogue of“Ma Ban’s commentary on differences and similarities”is probably the Song-dynasty version of Gao Xisun’s Shilve.As a matter of fact,these two versions didn’t attract the scholars’appraisal at all.Although labeled as the book of“Shi(history)and Han(Han Dynasty)”,the section of“History in Han Dynasty”is not the relevant bibliography for the comparative study of Records of the history and History in Han Dynasty,so it is important for catalogers to distinguish between them.In addition,the research methodology of the study of the difficulties in the comparison of the two books should not be confined to the history of the study of the difficulties in the comparison of the two books,and researchers should rather be familiar with the history of the study and keep a certain distance from it,and return to the original canon research for re-discerning the direction.

关 键 词：《史记》 《汉书》 目录学史 补述 研究方法 

分 类 号：K23[历史地理—历史学]