刘勰文体论对《翰林论》的因革  

The Inheritance and Innovation of Liu Xie’s Genre Theory from Han Lin Lun

作　　者：贾奋然[1] JIA Fenran(College of Liberal Arts,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100089)

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学文学院,北京100089

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2024年第2期107-113,共7页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：国家社科基金后期项目“历代文章分体文论辑要”(23FZWB004)。

摘　　要：《文心雕龙》文体论极大地受惠于李充《翰林论》所建构的关于各类文体的经典秩序、论文体例和简略评说;又充实、丰富、发展了《翰林论》“成文”“德音”“体要”等文体学思想,并探讨“深极骨髓”的文学根本问题,建构了完善的文学理论体系。其视野之开阔、思想之精深、方法之自觉、理论之完善远超出了李充论文水平。刘勰评《翰林论》“浅而寡要”大体合乎事实,“浅而寡要”之“浅”指精省浅近的措辞风格,未必贬辞;“寡要”为少要,亦并非完全否定判断。相较钟嵘贬之“疏而不切”,刘勰批评态度相对温和,且更公允。The genre theory in Wen Xin Diao Long significantly benefited from classical order,ways to discuss genre,and brief comments established in Han Lin Lun by Li Chong.Additionally,it enriched,expanded,and advanced the literary ideas presented in Han Lin Lun,including concepts like“chengwen”(written expression),“deyin”(moral resonance),and“tiyao”(key writing principles for literary genres).The work discussed the literary fundamental issues that were“deep to the bone marrow”and constructed a comprehensive system of literary theory.Its expansive perspective,profound ideas,self-aware methodology,and refined theory exceeded Li Chong’s essay level.Liu Xie’s remark that“Han Lin Lun is‘Qian Er Guayao(shallow and lacking essentials)’”generally corresponds to the facts.In this context,“Qian”refers to a concise style of expression,which is not necessarily derogatory,while“Guayao”signifies not being specific enough,and this does not imply a wholly negative judgment.In comparison to Zhong Rong’s critique,describing it as“Shu Er Buqie(negligent and inaccurate)”,Liu Xie’s evaluation is relatively moderate and more equitable.

关 键 词：《文心雕龙》 《翰林论》 吸纳超越 浅而寡要 精省浅近 

分 类 号：I04[文学—文学理论]