“双一流”高校学科建设评价的实证研究  

An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Discipline Construction in“Double First-class”Universities

作　　者：陈洁婷 蔡文伯[1,3] CHEN Jieting;&CAI Wenbo(College of Education Science,Xinjiang Normal University,Urumchi 830017,Xinjiang,China;Medicine College,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832003,Xinjiang,China;Normal College,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832003,Xinjiang,China)

机构地区：[1]新疆师范大学教育科学学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830017 [2]石河子大学医学院,新疆石河子832003 [3]石河子大学师范学院,新疆石河子832003

出　　处：《现代教育论丛》2024年第2期67-78,共12页Modern Education Review

基　　金：2023年国家自然科学基金地区项目“新疆乡村教育现代化高质量发展的动态监测与预警机制研究”(72264033);2023年新疆维吾尔自治区研生教育创新计划项目“新疆乡村教育高质量发展的动态监测与预警机制研究”(XJ2021GY11)。

摘　　要：“双一流”高校学科建设评价是实现国家战略目标和争创世界一流高校的有效政策工具。结合当前阶段“双一流”建设存在的主要问题和新时期教育改革的新要求、新理念,学科建设评价体系以“三螺旋”创新实践理论为理论框架,构建了人才培养、科学研究、教师队伍建设和社会服务四个维度。基于2020年我国122所“双一流”高校学科建设的截面数据,运用聚类分析熵权法、因子分析、优劣解距离法和偏最小二乘结构方程模型得出122所高校学科建设评价总体水平及相应的排名。依照聚类分析和综合排名,将高校按照学科建设评价水平排名依次划分为“领跑型”“并跑型”和“跟跑型”三种类型,其占比分别为43.5%、42.6%、13.9%。本研究为“双一流”高校学科动态调整机制提供理论依据,通过积极构建高校、社会、政府和市场多元化绩效评价体系,拓宽学科建设与社会需求相适应并共享的交叉研究领域,构建有利的学科发展生态环境,引导高校和学科争创世界一流。The evaluation of discipline construction in“Double First-class”universities is an effective policy tool to promote national strategic goals and strive for world-class schools.Combined with the main problems existing in the construction of“Double First-class”at the current stage as well as the new requirements and new concepts of educational reform in the new era,the evaluation system of discipline construction takes the“triple helix”innovation practice theory as the theoretical framework from four dimensions:talent training,scientific research,teacher team construction and social service.Based on the cross-sectional data of discipline construction in 122“Double First-class”universities in China in 2020,the overall level and corresponding rankings of discipline construction evaluation of 122 universities were obtained by using clustering method,entropy weight method,factor analysis,advantage and disadvantage solution distance method and partial least squares structural equation model.According to the cluster analysis and comprehensive ranking,the universities were divided into three types:“leading”,“parallel”and“following”,accounting for 43.5%,42.6%and 13.9%respectively.To provide a theoretical basis for the dynamic adjustment mechanism of disciplines in“Double First-class”universities,by actively constructing a diversified performance evaluation system for universities,society,government and market,the research broadens the interaction and cross-sharing researchfields between disciplines and social needs,builds a favorable ecological environment for discipline development,and guides universities and disciplines to lead the world.

关 键 词：“双一流”高校 绩效评价结果 绩效评价类型 

分 类 号：G649.3[文化科学—高等教育学] G649.7[文化科学—教育学]