检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈鹏[1] CHEN Peng(School of Sociology,Bejing Normal Unitersity,Bejing 100875,China)
出 处:《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》2024年第3期51-59,共9页Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:作为一个中国特色的概念范畴,“社会治理”构成认识和理解中国社会转型和社会发展的重要视角。从理论定位来看,社会治理具有作为“社会新政”、作为“社会工程”、作为“社会重建”的多重理论意涵。围绕社会治理的创新论域,主要形成了“政绩竞赛论”“党建引领论”“体制创新论”三种分析进路,其背后反映和体现了社会治理的动力机制和制度逻辑。从方法路径上来看,深化社会治理研究需要坚持理论与经验、学术与政策、宏观与微观、多元与交叉的相互连接、融合和贯通。As a conceptual category with Chinese characteristics,“social governance”constitutes an important perspective for recognizing and understanding China's social transformation and development.From a theoretical perspective,social governance has multiple theoretical implications as a“new social policy”,as a“social engineering”,and as a“social reconstruction”.The innovative field of social governance has mainly formed three analytical approaches:“performance competition theory”,“Party building leadership theory”,and“system innovation theory”,which reflects and manifests the driving mechanism and institutional logic of social governance.From the perspective of methodology,deepening research on social governance requires adhering to the interconnection,and integration of theory and experience,academia and policy,macro and micro,and diversity and intersection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.145.200