检视维利里奥的技术审美思想——兼及与斯蒂格勒、鲍德里亚等的比较  

A Study of Virilio’s Technological Aesthetics Thought: Comparing with Bernard Stiegler, Jean Baudrillard and Others

作　　者：郭敏 GUO Min(School of Humanities,Nanchang University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330031,China)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学人文学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《河北民族师范学院学报》2024年第2期26-33,共8页Journal of Hebei Normal University For Nationalities

基　　金：2019年度国家社科基金一般项目“数字美学理论话语建构研究”(19BZW027)。

摘　　要：维利里奥捕捉到了技术的重要维度即速度,以此为凭建构了他关于光速消失的哲学和美学理论,完成了物理学-哲学-美学的三级连环跳跃。其灰色生态学注意到了远程通信技术建构出来的无质量事物形态。机器变革使得人类面临多种多样的信息危机和伦理考验,用户的变异的审美体验呈现出常失神、冷恐慌和无记忆的特征。问题的出现也在召唤解决问题的努力,技术的泯灭一定不是人类的福音。维利里奥发聋振聩的技术审美之思对于我们破解数智化困境,优化技术文化生态不无积极启示。Virilio captured the important dimension of technology,that is dromology,based on which he constructed his philosophical and aesthetic theory on the disappearance of the dromology of light,and completed the three-level leap of physics-philosophy-aesthetics.Its grey ecology pays attention to the form of quality-free things constructed by remote communication technology.Machine change makes human beings face a variety of information crises and ethical tests,and the variant aesthetic experience of users is characterized by frequent loss of“picnolepsie”,“panique froide”,and“no memory”.The emergence of the problem also calls for efforts to solve the problem,and the extinction of technology must not be the gospel of mankind.Virilio’s thought of technological aesthetics is not without positive enlightenment for us to solve the dilemma of numerical intelligence and optimize the ecology of technological culture.

关 键 词：速度 灰色生态学 常失神 冷恐慌 无记忆 

分 类 号：B83[哲学宗教—美学]