检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:米力阳 MI Liyang(School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China;School of Science and Chemical Engineering,Ningxia Institute of Science and Technology,Shizuishan 753000,China)
机构地区:[1]东北大学工商管理学院,辽宁沈阳110169 [2]宁夏理工学院理学与化学工程学院,宁夏石嘴山753000
出 处:《物流科技》2024年第9期115-121,共7页Logistics Sci-Tech
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71772035);宁夏高等学校科学研究项目(NGY2022153)。
摘 要:针对供应商和制造商研发创新问题,构建两阶段供应链创新博弈模型,分析技术溢出系数、研发投入和风险承受差异对供应链企业创新决策的影响。研究表明,不同研发策略选择下,研发投入临界值不尽相同;当技术溢出系数较高,并且研发投入较低时,双方均自主研发的供应链系统利润最高,而当技术溢出系数较低,或者研发投入较高时,合作研发的优势显著;在考虑风险承受差异的收益分配机制下,风险承受能力强的企业期望利润与风险承受差异负相关,而风险承受能力弱的企业期望利润、最低创新成功率阈值与风险承受差异正相关。Aiming at the problem of innovation between supplier and manufacturer,a two-stage supply chain innovation game model is constructed,and the influence of technology spillover coefficient,R&D investment and risk tolerance difference on the innovation decision of supply chain enterprises is analyzed.The results show that the critical value of R&D investment is different under different R&D strategies.When the technology spillover coefficient is high and the R&D investment is low,the profit of supply chain system under independent R&D by both parties is the highest,while when the technology spillover coefficient is low or the R&D investment is high,the advantage of cooperative R&D is more obvious.Under the income distribution mechanism considering risk tolerance difference,the expected profit of enterprise with strong risk tolerance is negatively correlated with risk tolerance difference,while the expected profit of enterprise with weak risk tolerance and the lowest innovation success rate threshold are positively correlated with risk tolerance difference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31