检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈凯玲 王坤 毛丽娟 毛枫 韩红 曹佳颖 张小龙 王文平 CHEN Kailing;WANG Kun;MAO Lijuan;MAO Feng;HAN Hong;CAO Jiaying;ZHANG Xiaolong;WANG Wenping(Department of Ultrasound,Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging,Shanghai 200032,China)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属中山医院超声科,上海200032 [2]上海市影像医学研究所,上海200032
出 处:《肿瘤影像学》2024年第2期156-162,共7页Oncoradiology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(82272013);上海市自然科学基金(20ZR1452800);上海申康中心重大临床研究项目(SHDC2020CR1031B)。
摘 要:目的:观察瑞格非尼对不全消融残癌的抑制作用并探讨动态三维超声造影(three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound,3D-CEUS)评估靶向治疗反应的可行性。方法:构建兔VX_(2)肝原位种植瘤模型及不全消融模型,随机将实验兔分为4组(n=5):不全消融组(A组)、不全消融+靶向治疗组(B组)、靶向治疗组(C组)、对照组(D组)。在不全消融治疗前当天及治疗后7、14、21、28 d进行3D-CEUS检查并进行在机定量参数分析,实验结束后取出VX_(2)肿瘤行细胞增殖指数(Ki-67)、CD34免疫组织化学染色,计算微血管密度(microvessel density,MVD)并比较各组间差异。结果:在治疗后21和28 d,B组和C组的峰值强度(peak intensity,PI)显著低于治疗前(P值分别为0.046,0.033);而且,B组和C组的PI与D组相比差异有统计学意义(P值分别为0.027,0.031)。在治疗后28 d,B组和C组的上升支斜率(S)显著低于同时期对照组(P值分别为0.035,0.014);而且B组与A组相比差异有统计学意义(P=0.027)。治疗后28 d,各组肿瘤组织Ki-67增殖指数、MVD计数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)结论:3D-CEUS定量分析技术可反映瑞格非尼抑制肝VX_(2)原位种植瘤残癌增殖的治疗效果。Objective:To observe the feasibility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound(3D-CEUS)in evaluating the inhibitory effect of regorafenib on incomplete ablation of residual cancer.Methods:The rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups(n=5):incomplete ablation group(group A),incomplete ablation+targeted therapy group(group B),targeted therapy group(group C),and control group(group D).3D-CEUS was performed on the day before treatment and 7,14,21,28 d after treatment,and quantitative parameters were analyzed in vivo.VX_(2) tumors were taken out at the end of the experiment for cell proliferation index(Ki-67)and CD34 immunohistochemical staining,and microvessel density(MVD)was calculated.Results:At 21 and 28 days after treatment,the peak intensity(PI)of group B and C was significantly lower than that before treatment(P=0.046,0.033,respectively).Moreover,the PI of group B and group C were significantly different from that of group D(P=0.027,0.031,respectively).At 28 d after treatment,the ascending slope(S)of group B and group C was significantly lower than that of the control group(P=0.035,0.014,respectively).There was significant difference between group B and group A(P=0.027).At 28 d after treatment,there was no significant difference in Ki-67 proliferation index and MVD among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Quantitative analysis parameters of 3D-CEUS can reflect the efficacy of regorafenib in inhibiting the proliferation of residual cancer after incomplete ablation of VX_(2) in situ orthotopic tumor.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.200.145