网络新闻信息平台的合理核实义务研究——从证明真实到证明尽到义务  

Research on the Reasonable Verification Obligations of News Information Platforms——Proving Truth and Fulfilling the Obligations

作　　者：卢家银 LU Jia-yin(Research Center of Journalism and Social Development,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China;School of Journalism and Communication,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学新闻与社会发展研究中心 [2]中国人民大学新闻学院,北京100872

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第2期118-129,共12页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国人民大学“双一流”建设马克思主义新闻观创新研究(MXG202311)。

摘　　要：合理核实义务是新闻信息平台承担的一项基本注意义务。在现有过错规定的基础上,《中华人民共和国民法典》在实定法层面创制了合理核实义务的制度,将以往的业务规范、行政要求和司法意见上升为法定义务,在基础法框架内为新闻信息平台的义务履行建立了清晰的规则。对合理核实义务认定标准,民法典的“六要素说”已成为明确的法定标准和适用依据,而是否获得经济利益是适用法律的非必要参考。虽然各类新闻平台承担的核实义务存有差异,但共同的趋向是许多法院已经从要求证明内容真实转向证明尽到合理核实义务。The obligation of reasonable verification is a basic duty of care undertaken by the news information platform.On the basis of the fault provisions,the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China created a system of reasonable verification obligations at the level of actual law,elevated the previous business norms,administrative requirementsand judicial opinions to statutory obligations,and established clear rules for the performance of the obligations of news platforms within the framework of basic law.For the identification criteria,“six elements theory”has become a clear legal standard and application basis,and whether to obtain economic benefits is an unnecessary reference for the applicable law.Although there are differences in the verification obligations undertaken by various news platforms,the common trend is that many courts have shifted from requiring proof of the truth of content to proof of reasonable verification obligations.

关 键 词：核实义务 媒体侵权 新闻信息平台 平台义务 

分 类 号：G209[文化科学—传播学]