中国法律论证学的语用转向  

The Pragmatic Turn in China’s Legal Argumentation Studies

作　　者：牛子涵 熊明辉 Zihan Niu;Minghui Xiong

机构地区：[1]中山大学逻辑与认知研究所 [2]浙江大学光华法学院

出　　处：《逻辑学研究》2024年第2期1-16,共16页Studies in Logic

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“语用逻辑的深度拓展与应用研究”(19ZDA042)资助。

摘　　要：在我国,“法律论证学”,习惯上称为“法律论证理论”,其实是一个舶来词。作为法学理论的一个正式分支,虽然它于本世纪初才从欧美学界引入我国,但其理论探寻源头可追溯至我国二十世纪八十年代兴起的法律逻辑学研究。我国法律论证学研究以上个世纪八十年代探讨逻辑学在法律中的应用为开端,经历了上个世纪九十年代的法律推理转向和本世纪初的法律论证转向,统称为“语用转向”。通过语用转向,解决了传统法律逻辑学研究中的理论困境问题,走出了一条法律论证研究的中国路径,让我国法律论证学研究基本与国际接轨。In China,“legal argumentation studies”,commonly referred to as“legal argumentation theory”,is an imported term.As a formal branch of legal theory,although it was introduced from the Western academia in the early 21st century,its theoretical exploration can be traced back to the study of legal logic that emerged in China in the 1980s.The research on legal argumentation in China started with the exploration of the application of logic in law in the 1980s,experienced a turn in legal reasoning in the 1990s,and a turn towards legal argumentation at the beginning of this century,collectively called“pragmatic turn”.Through the pragmatic turn,it addressed the theoretical dilemmas in traditional legal logic research,paving a unique path for legal argumentation research in China and bringing it into alignment with international standards.

关 键 词：法律论证学 法学理论 法律逻辑 法律推理 法律论证 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]