中国刑事附带民事诉讼制度的私法化改进  

On the Improvement of the Privatization of China's Criminal Attached Civil Litigation System

作　　者：潘文惠 PAN Wen-hui(School of Law,Hunan University,Changsha 410012)

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,长沙410012

出　　处：《张家口职业技术学院学报》2024年第1期5-7,共3页Journal of Zhangjiakou Vocational and Technical College

摘　　要：刑事附带民事诉讼制度的本质是民事诉讼。尽管新《刑诉法解释》对刑事附带民事诉讼制度做了修改与补充,但鉴于两种诉讼之间的本质区别,加上相关法律条文的缺失,我国刑事附带民事诉讼制度在司法实践中产生了赔偿范围过窄、被害人权利保障不足、民事诉讼过度依赖刑事诉讼、民事诉讼证明标准过高等问题。改进我国刑事附带民事诉讼制度的路径:首先,从新《刑诉法解释》入手,明确可以受理精神损害赔偿的案件范围,并以实质标准加以规范。其次,应给予民事诉讼独立性,使受害者有权通过民事诉讼来获得救济。The essence of criminal attached civil litigation system is civil litigation.Although the new edition of Interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Law has modified and supplemented criminal attached civil litigation system,in view of the essential difference between the two kinds of litigation and the lack of relevant legal provisions,problems such as too narrow a scope of compensation,insufficient protection of the rights and interests of victims,excessive dependence of civil litigation on criminal litigation,and higher evidentiary standards in civil litigation have arisen in the practical application of China's criminal attached civil litigation system.The path to the improvement of China's criminal attached civil litigation system can start from the new edition of Interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Law.Firstly,we can clarify the scope of cases that can be admitted for compensation for mental injury and regulate them with substantive standards.Secondly,civil litigation should be given independence so that victims have the right to obtain relief through civil litigation.

关 键 词：刑事附带民事诉讼 精神损害赔偿 私法化 独立性 

分 类 号：D915.18[政治法律—诉讼法学]