检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴越[1] 卢云峰[1] Wu Yue;Lu Yunfeng
机构地区:[1]北京大学社会学系
出 处:《复印报刊资料(宗教)》2022年第3期20-33,共14页
摘 要:宗教理性选择理论作为一种新范式,在社会学界引起了诸多讨论和争议。最常见的批评之一可以概括为“隐喻论”,即认为它只是借用一些经济隐作为修辞策略,但对宗教研究没有实质性贡献。这是一种误解。隐喻论忽视了宗教理性选择理论的理论建模,即利用规范语言建立简约明晰的理论模型的方法。本文展现了宗教理性选择理论在微观、中观、宏观层次的理论建模,以此说明宗教理性选择理论在各个层次都不是隐喻,而是致力于用理论模型整合前人洞见并启发后续研究,从而推动一个研究领域内一般性知识体系的积累。对于中国宗教研究来说,我们不应只关注宗教理性选择理论现有的结论,而应该借鉴它的理论建模来构建适合于中国的理论模型。The most common criticism of the Rational Choice Theory of Religion(RCTR)may be summarized as"the argument of metaphor"which holds that RCTR has only borrowed some economic metaphors as a kind of rhetoric tactic,and has made no substantial contribution to the study of religion.The fallacy of this argument is that it has ne-glected the theoretical modeling of RCTR which is a method of using formal language to build concise and clear theo-retical models.This paper presents the theoretical modeling of RCTR at the micro,meso and macro levels so as to show that RCTR is not a metaphor at all these levels,but is committed to integrating the insights of previous research-ers and enlightening subsequent studies with theoretical models,thereby promoting the accumulation of general knowl-edge in this given field.For the study of Chinese religion,we should not only pay attention to the existing conclusions of RCTR,but should also learn from its theoretical modeling to build theoretical models suitable for China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.207.122