小田岳夫先生与中国文学  

Mr.Oda Takeo and Chinese Literature

作　　者： 颜淑兰(译) Ito Toramaru;YAN Shuan(transated)(Tokyo Women's University,Tokyo 1670041,Japan;Institute of Literature,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)

机构地区：[1]日本东京女子大学,日本东京1670041 [2]中国社会科学院文学研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期45-51,共7页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：伊藤虎丸通过对与小田岳夫交往的回忆,从小田岳夫的“人品”切人,探讨其思想与文学,尤其阐明了小田岳夫《鲁迅传》的价值,进而重新评价了竹内好的《鲁迅》。伊藤先生指出,作为日本第一部严格意义上的鲁迅传记,小田《鲁迅传》是划时代的,竹内《鲁迅》是建立在其基础之上。相较小田提出的“‘爱国’者”鲁迅,竹内提出的“文学者”鲁迅则包含某种倒退乃至妥协。Through his recollection of the interaction with Oda Takeo,Ito Toramaru explores Oda Takeo's thoughts and literature by examining his“personality”.In addition,the value of Oda Takeo's Ro Jin den(Biography of Lu Xun)is further elucidated and Takeuchi Yoshimi's Ro Jin(Lu Xun)is reevaluated by Ito Toramaru,who points out that as Japan's first strictly defined bi-ography of Lu Xun,Oda Takeo's Biography of Lu Xun was epoch-making and Takeuchi Yoshimi's Lu Xun was built on its foundation.Compared to the“patriot”Lu Xun proposed by Oda Takeo,the“literary”Lu Xun proposed by Takeuchi Yoshimi implies some kind of regression and even compromise.

关 键 词：鲁迅 小田岳夫 《鲁迅传》 竹内好 《鲁迅》 

分 类 号：I210[文学—中国文学]