检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李祎恒[1] 董云帆 Li Yiheng;Dong Yunfan(School of Law,Hohai University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211100,China)
出 处:《河北经贸大学学报》2024年第3期76-83,共8页Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“国土空间数字化治理的法治保障研究”(23BFX036)。
摘 要:现阶段宅基地使用权继承纠纷解决存在司法处理态度不一、缺少统一立法规范的实践困境。根本原因在于宅基地使用权兼具身份价值和财产价值,而现有纠纷处理模式不能达成两种价值取向的均衡。鉴于此,建议适用“身份资格—房地关系”双重标准的限制继承规则作为司法裁判指引,同时明确“三权分置”背景下宅基地使用权的成员权内涵,以填补双重标准裁判规则的理论漏洞,消解新规则的内在矛盾。At present,there are practical difficulties in the settlement of inheritance disputes of the right to the use of homestead land,such as different attitudes towards judicial treatment and lack of unified legislative norms.The fundamental reason is that the right to use homestead has both identity value and property value,and the existing dispute settlement model can not achieve the balance of the two value orientations.In view of this,it is suggested to apply the double-standard restrictive inheritance rule of "identity qualification-real estate relationship" as the guidance of judicial judgment,and at the same time clarify the connotation of membership rights of homestead use right under the background of "separation of three rights",so as to fill the theoretical loopholes of the double-standard judgment rule and resolve the inherent contradictions of the new rule.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49