非法微信证据排除规则构建  

Construction of Exclusion Rules for Illegal WeChat Evidence

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:许瑾 XU Jin(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出  处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2024年第4期78-81,共4页Journal of Harbin University

摘  要:在互联网应用常态化下,微信早已成为人们生活工作不可或缺的工具,其易存储、易提取等优点使得微信证据成为诉讼双方当事人使用最为频繁的电子数据证据之一。但由于其具有流动性与虚拟性,存储方式与取证方式呈现多样化,导致恶意截取、私自伪造证据等问题层出不穷。我国非法证据排除规则虽在民事诉讼领域已初步确立,但在具体适用方面尚缺乏可供其良性开展的逻辑体系和规则明细,亟需确立微信证据“三性”审查规则,完善相关配套制度,从而发挥其实效性。Under the normalization of Internet applications,WeChat has long become an indispensable tool for people’s life and work.Its advantages such as easy storage and extraction make WeChat evidence one of the most frequently used electronic data evidence by litigants.However,due to its liquidity and virtuality,as well as its diverse storage and evidence collection methods,problems such as malicious interception and unauthorized forgery of evidence continue to emerge.Although the exclusionary rules for illegal evidence in China have been preliminarily established in the field of civil litigation,there is still a lack of a logical system and detailed rules for its specific application.It is urgent to establish the“three characteristics”review rules for WeChat evidence,improve relevant supporting systems,and play its effectiveness.

关 键 词:非法证据排除规则 微信证据 采信规则 

分 类 号:D925.113[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象