检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许瑾 XU Jin(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2024年第4期78-81,共4页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:在互联网应用常态化下,微信早已成为人们生活工作不可或缺的工具,其易存储、易提取等优点使得微信证据成为诉讼双方当事人使用最为频繁的电子数据证据之一。但由于其具有流动性与虚拟性,存储方式与取证方式呈现多样化,导致恶意截取、私自伪造证据等问题层出不穷。我国非法证据排除规则虽在民事诉讼领域已初步确立,但在具体适用方面尚缺乏可供其良性开展的逻辑体系和规则明细,亟需确立微信证据“三性”审查规则,完善相关配套制度,从而发挥其实效性。Under the normalization of Internet applications,WeChat has long become an indispensable tool for people’s life and work.Its advantages such as easy storage and extraction make WeChat evidence one of the most frequently used electronic data evidence by litigants.However,due to its liquidity and virtuality,as well as its diverse storage and evidence collection methods,problems such as malicious interception and unauthorized forgery of evidence continue to emerge.Although the exclusionary rules for illegal evidence in China have been preliminarily established in the field of civil litigation,there is still a lack of a logical system and detailed rules for its specific application.It is urgent to establish the“three characteristics”review rules for WeChat evidence,improve relevant supporting systems,and play its effectiveness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.1.194