自洗钱与上游犯罪应数罪并罚  

Self-Laundering and Predicate Offences are Punishable Together

作　　者：张宜培 Zhang Yipei

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学

出　　处：《青少年犯罪问题》2024年第2期71-83,共13页Issues on Juvenile Crimes and Delinquency

摘　　要：自洗钱入刑给洗钱罪的理解和适用带来了新的难题,其中就包括自洗钱与上游犯罪的罪数处断问题。从一重罪处罚说要么因不当划定洗钱罪和上游犯罪的界限而将案件错误认定为想象竞合犯,要么因忽视犯罪目的同一性和牵连关系两方面的要求而将案件错误认定为牵连犯。区分处理说不仅因割裂了洗钱罪的行为方式体系而缺乏实质合理性,而且相关区分标准也模糊不清。缓刑适用率高低无法作为否定数罪并罚的理由。对自洗钱与上游犯罪实行数罪并罚不仅符合修法意图、相关刑法原则以及司法经济性的要求,而且具有充分的规范、实践依据,还与其他国家的做法相接轨,具有合理性。The criminalization of self-laundering has brought many new difficulties to the understanding and application of the crime of money laundering,including the issue of the number of crimes of self-laundering and predicate crimes.The penalty for a felony is either a mistaken identification of the case as an imaginary complicity because of the improper delineation of the line between the offence of money-laundering and the predicate offence,or a misidentification of the case as an implicated offender by ignoring the requirement of the unity of purpose and implication of the crime.The distinction is not only lacking substantive rationality because it fragments the system of conduct of the crime of money laundering,but also the relevant distinguishing criteria are vague.The rate of application of probation cannot be used as a reason to deny the concurrent punishment of several crimes.The simultaneous punishment of several crimes for self-laundering and predicate crimes not only meets the requirements of the intention of the amendment,relevant criminal law principles and judicial economy,but also has sufficient normative and practical basis,and is also in line with the practices of other countries and is reasonable.

关 键 词：自洗钱 上游犯罪 牵连犯 想象竞合犯 数罪并罚 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]