信得及与疑而归信:王龙溪与江右王门工夫理路之比较  

Xindeji and from Doubt to Faith:Comparison of Effort Approaches between Wang Ji and Yangming Schools in Jiangyou

作　　者：胡志明 HU Zhi-ming(Department of Philosophy,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,Guangdong,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学哲学系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期19-25,共7页Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：阳明后学基于对信得及的不同理解,呈现为两种工夫模式:王龙溪以信得及为前提条件,从“人们应然的本质结构”上立论,主张先天立根的易简工夫;江右王门则偏向以信得及为结果效验,从“人们实然的存在过程”处立教,强调亲体彻透之后仍需时时保任。在从信与疑、先与后、易与难等角度比较两者的基础上,通过援引怀疑解释学与信心解释学的理论来阐发信得及与良知本体的意象结构,有益于更为全面地理解两种工夫理路的各自特点,彰显江右王门“世无现成良知乃深信良知”的思想旨归。实际上,双方并无抵牾,唯有相资为用,方能贯彻阳明晚年简易与真切互蕴的彻上彻下之旨。Based on different understandings of Xindeji(believing),post-Wang Yangming scholars presented two kinds of effort:Wang Ji(also Wang Longxi)took Xindeji as a precondition,argued from the“essential structure of what people should be”,and advocated the easy and simple effort of the innate root.Wang Yangming Schools in Jiangyou,on the other hand,tended to take Xindeji as a result,and established teaching methods from the“process of people’s actual existence,”emphasizing constant preservation even after a fully understanding by himself.On the basis of comparing Wang Ji and Jiangyou Schools from the perspectives of believing and doubting,innate and empirical,easy and difficult,this paper analyzes the image structure of Xindeji and the noumenon of conscience by referring to the theories of hermeneutics of suspicion and hermeneutics of faith,which is helpful to a more comprehensive understanding of their respective characteristics,and to highlight the ideological purport of Jiangyou Schools that“there is no ready-made conscience,and conscience only comes from deep believing”.In fact,there is no contradiction between the two,and only by utilizing both of them,can Wang Yangming’s ultimate goal in his late years of simplicity and truthfulness can be realized.

关 键 词：江右王门 王龙溪 信得及 怀疑解释学 世无现成良知 

分 类 号：B248.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]