犯罪参与体系中单一制之提倡  

The Advocacy of the Single System Legislation Model in Joint Crime

作　　者：刘昊炜 童德华[1] LIU Haowei;TONG Dehua(School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《济宁学院学报》2024年第2期53-58,共6页Journal of Jining University

摘　　要：在犯罪参与体系中有德日区分制体系和我国单一制体系。区分制体系因其立法缺陷产生了不可调和的矛盾,为追求合理处罚的目的,不惜违背限制的正犯概念。区分制体系产生如此结果的原因在于将分工分类法与刑罚挂钩。相比之下,单一制体系则具有更加明显的优势,以作用分类法决定犯罪人的量刑更加合理,而其缺陷可以通过借鉴他国刑法理论得以弥补。In the criminal participation system,there are the German-Japanese distinction system and the unitary system of our country.Because of its legislative defects,the differentiation system produces irreconcilable contradictions.In order to pursue the purpose of reasonable punishment,the concept of principal offender of limitation is violated at all costs.The reason why the system of distinction produces such a result is that it mistakenly links the division of labor and classification with punishment.The unitary system has more obvious advantages,and it is more reasonable to decide the punishment of criminals by the function classification method,and its defects can be remedied by learning from the criminal law theories of other countries.

关 键 词：犯罪参与体系 区分制 单一制 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]