检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙章晟 李文昊 Zhangsheng Sun;Wenhao Li(School of Political Science and Law,Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi 830011,Xinjiang;Law School of South China Normal University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510555)
机构地区:[1]新疆师范大学政法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830011 [2]华南师范大学法学院,广东广州510555
出 处:《教育思想理论研究》2024年第2期55-58,共4页
摘 要:行政复议与行政诉讼是我国行政法治体系中的重要组成部分,两者在维护公民权益、规范政府行为等方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,在实际操作中,这两种制度之间存在一些衔接不畅的问题。如何更好地衔接行政复议与行政诉讼制度,提高其效率和公正性,是值得相关人员深入探讨的重要课题。对此,通过阐述行政复议与行政诉讼的发展与学理,分析行政复议制度与行政诉讼制度的内在逻辑,进而探究行政复议与行政诉讼制度衔接模式,以更好地发挥两种制度的作用,为当事人提供更加公正、便捷、有效的法律救济途径。Administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation are important components of China's administrative rule of law sys⁃tem,playing a crucial role in safeguarding citizen rights and regulating government behavior.However,in practical operation,there are some issues with the smooth connection between these two systems.How to better connect administrative reconsideration and administrative litiga⁃tion systems,improve their efficiency and fairness,is an important issue worth in-depth exploration by relevant personnel.In this regard,by elaborating on the development and theory of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation,analyzing the internal logic of the administrative reconsideration system and administrative litigation system,and exploring the connection mode between the administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation systems,in order to better play the role of the two systems and provide more fair,convenient,and effective legal remedies for parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7