检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫冰 张爱梅[2] 靳祎 Yan Bing;Zhang Aimei;Jin Yi(School of Basic Medical Sciences,Hebei University;Education and Teacher Training Promotion Center,Hebei University,Baoding 071000,Hebei,China)
机构地区:[1]河北大学基础医学院 [2]河北大学教育教学研究与教师培训促进中心,河北保定071000
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2024年第3期63-64,共2页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:河北省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目:多元主体视角下的地方本科院校教师教学评价研究(2020GJJG488);河北省教育厅2020-2021年度新医科背景下多学科交叉复合型人才培养模式的探索——以临床医学专业为例(2020GJJG015)。
摘 要:目的:探讨学生对医学基础课与临床课和线下与线上两种教学方式的教学评教成绩差异性。方法:对相邻两个学年同为春学期开设的相同课程的线下教学与线上教学评教成绩进行比较分析。结果:基础课和临床课线下教学的学生评教成绩均高于线上教学;线下和线上教学,学生对临床课的评教成绩均高于基础课;其差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:线下教学得到评教成绩高于线上教学,临床课得到评教成绩优于基础课。Objective:To explore the differences in teaching evaluation scores of medical basic courses and clinical courses between online and offline teaching modes.Methods:Comparative analysis of teaching evaluation scores for the same courses offered in adjacent academic years,comparing offline and online teaching.Results:The teaching evaluation scores of students in offline teaching of basic and clinical courses were higher than those in online teaching;both offline and online teaching,students'evaluation scores for clinical courses were higher than those for basic courses;the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Offline teaching received higher teaching evaluation scores than online teaching,and clinical courses received higher evaluation scores than basic courses.
关 键 词:医学基础课 临床课 线上教学 线下教学 评教成绩
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143