检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴一凡[1] 柯桢楠[2] WU Yifan;KE Zhennan(TanKAh Kee College,Xiamen University,Zhuangzhou,Fujian,363105;Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian,361005)
机构地区:[1]厦门大学嘉庚学院,福建漳州363105 [2]厦门大学,福建厦门361005
出 处:《湖南包装》2024年第2期176-178,209,共4页
基 金:教育部产学合作协同育人项目(22097124084955)。
摘 要:以ChatGPT为代表的AIGC对学生设计思维的培养提出了新的挑战。从主体性的回归、艺术性的呼唤与创造性的提升3个角度对学生设计思维培养的困境进行解析,并通过理论阐释与教学,探讨对AIGC时代学生设计思维的培养进行批判性的思考。一味追随智能技术并不能有效培养学生的设计思维,而技术依赖则容易导致设计教学中主体性的消解、艺术性的背离和创新性思维能力的减退。面向AIGC时代应当正视学生设计思维培养的多元价值,通过人文教育加强学生的主体性,并以美育教育为基础,聚焦批判性思维的提升,以实现设计创新人才培养的可能。The AIGC represented by ChatGPT poses new challenges to the cultivation of students'design thinking.This paper analyzes the dilemma of the cultivation of students'design thinking from three perspectives:the return of subjectivity,the call for artistry and the promotion of creativity,and critically thinks about the cultivation of students'design thinking in AIGC era through theoretical interpretation and teaching discussion.Blindly following intelligent technology can not effectively cultivate students'design thinking,and technology dependence can easily lead to the dissolution of subjectivity,artistic deviation and the decline of innovative thinking ability in design teaching.Facing the AIGC era,we should face up to the multiple values of students'design thinking training,strengthen students'subjectivity through humanistic education,and focus on the improvement of critical thinking on the basis of aesthetic education,so as to realize the possibility of training innovative design talents.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] J50-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3