兼容与迭代:数字诉讼的三种形态  

Compatibility and Iteration:Three Forms of Digital Litigation

作　　者：左卫民 沈思竹 Zuo Weimin;Shen Sizhu

机构地区：[1]四川大学 [2]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期64-70,201,202,共9页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：四川省哲学社会科学重点实验室“实证法学与智慧法治实验室(2023)”研究项目(2022sksys-03);四川省社科重点研究基地“纠纷解决与司法改革研究中心”项目(jdpt-2022法学001)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：当下,司法领域已经或者可能出现三种形态的数字诉讼。1.0形态的数字诉讼是数字技术与传统诉讼结合的初级形态,诉讼的基本机制和规则并未发生根本性变化;2.0形态的数字诉讼旨在通过数字技术方式处理依托于数字技术的数字纠纷,并在一定程度上开始脱离传统诉讼原理的束缚;在3.0形态的数字诉讼中,数字技术广泛运用于证据的形成及其审查判断,纠纷与诉讼程序的展开亦与数字技术密不可分,诉讼理念、原则以及具体的诉讼规则也与传统诉讼明显区分开来。三种形态的数字诉讼不同而兼容,交替并迭代。在数字诉讼形态迭代的过程中,司法正义实现的方式以及司法正义概念本身也在变化。The development of digital technology has not only changed people’s lifestyles but also profoundly impacted traditional legal systems and litigation methods. Currently, digital litigation is being questioned due to its contradiction with some traditional litigation principles. Therefore, further research is required on whether to continue promoting the development of digital litigation and how.By examining the application of digital technology in litigation and referencing the classification proposed by some scholars, the author identifies three forms of digital litigation worldwide. Digital litigation 1.0 represents the initial stage where digital technology is integrated with traditional litigation, primarily digitizing some procedural aspects within the traditional litigation framework without fundamentally altering its basic mechanisms and rules. Digital litigation 2.0 originates from the digitization of disputes in the digital age and aims to handle disputes relying on digital technology through digital means, gradually breaking away from the constraints of traditional litigation principles. Digital litigation 3.0 signifies a revolutionary stage characterized by the extensive use of digital technology in evidence formation, review, and judgment. Disputes and litigation procedures are inherently intertwined with digital technology, and the concepts, principles, and specific litigation rules significantly diverge from traditional litigation. From the perspective of judicial entities, the utilization of artificial intelligence and big data management will become prominent features of this stage, inevitably influencing judges during the adjudication process, and possibly leading to the emergence of AI judges.Currently, both Digital litigation 1.0 and 2.0 exist, while Digital litigation 3.0 is still in its nascent stage, yet with immense potential for development. Presently, generative artificial intelligence technologies like ChatGPT are beginning to tentatively play a role in Digital litigations 1.0 and 2.0,

关 键 词：数字诉讼 司法正义 诉讼形态 兼容 迭代 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学] D926.2[政治法律—法学]