变革型还是交易型:重审高校学术中层管理者领导风格对教职工的影响  

Transformational or Transactional Leadership:Rethinking the Effects of Academic Middle Managers'Leadership Styles on Higher Education Faculty

作　　者：赵腾 钱诚[2] Zhao Teng;Qian Cheng(Zhejiang Academy of Higher Education,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Zhejiang Hangzhou,310018;Chinese Academy of Science and Education Evaluation,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Zhejiang Hangzhou,310018)

机构地区：[1]杭州电子科技大学浙江高等教育研究院,浙江杭州310018 [2]杭州电子科技大学中国科教评价研究院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《评价与管理》2024年第1期54-59,共6页Evaluation & Management

基　　金：浙江省社科规划课题“共同富裕背景下农村数字人才培养关键要素与实现路径研究”(23NDJC161YB)的研究成果之一。

摘　　要：高校教职员工在新时代高等教育中扮演着至关重要的角色,因此其满意度、积极性和效率显得异常重要。已有研究表明领导风格对三者有显著影响。聚焦高校学术中层管理者(AMMs),本文力图重新审视领导风格对教职员工满意度、积极性和效率的影响。通过选取两种被高等教育界广泛使用的领导类型,即变革型领导和交易型领导加以区分AMMs的领导风格,本文构建了一个关于AMMs领导风格影响教职员工满意度、积极性和效率的逻辑模型。研究发现,变革型和交易型领导都会对教职员工产生积极影响,但在新时代高等教育大背景下,变革型领导显然更受教职员工欢迎。Given the important role of faculty in current higher education system,their satisfactions,motivations,and effectiveness seem so important ever.Previous research has illustrated that leadership styles have significant and positive impacts on these three outcomes.Focusing on academic middle managers(AMMs),this paper tries to reexamine the effects of AMMs leadership styles on faculty satisfaction,motivation,and effectiveness.A logic framework is developed to reexamine these effects by using two most widely used leadership styles in the field of higher education-transformational leadership and transactional leadership.Results show that both transformational and transactional leadership have positive effects on faculty,with transformational leadership is more preferred by faculty in current higher education context.

关 键 词：学术中层管理者 变革型领导 交易型领导 教职工 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]