检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱春龙 赵英英[1] 侯冷晨 朱鸿[1] 许冠吾 沈怡[1] Zhu Chunlong;Zhao Yingying;Hou Lengchen(Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai,200080,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]上海市第一人民医院,上海200080 [2]上海市申康医院发展中心,上海200041
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2024年第4期36-41,共6页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:市级医院诊疗技术推广及优化管理项目(究SHDC12022622);DRG细分组优化及病案首页质量提升研((YNGL-2023-29);上海市医院协会医院管理研究基金X2022180)。
摘 要:目的:借鉴澳大利亚病例临床复杂模型(ECC)对本市眼底手术治疗组(CB1)进行DRG分组优化研究,并拟提分组改进方案。方法:调研收集上海市21家医院CB1组病例数据;使用MATLAB软件构建组内病例费用关系函数,并计算治疗复杂程度值(TCL)和病例临床复杂程度值(ECCS);使用SPSS 24.0对量化的ECCS进行决策树分类;结果采用组内差异值(CV)、组间差异(RIV)、秩和检验(K-W)进行评价和检验。结果:CB1基本组病例被划分成轻度复杂(CV 0.65)、中度复杂(CV 0.39)、重度复杂(CV 0.30),细分组RIV=0.61,P<0.01,符合独立分组规范要求。结论:在CB1组的基础上,应用手术及操作为自变量的ECC模型能进一步体现治疗复杂程度,提升分组性能,更好地满足医保付费和绩效考核的需求。基于研究结果拟提的分组方案已被市医保局采纳,为地方动态调整DRG分组提供决策依据。Objective:To optimize the grouping of the fundus surgery treatment group(CB1)in Shanghai by drawing on the Australian episode clinical complexity(ECC)model,and to propose a grouping improvement plan.Methods:CB1 data were collected from 21 hospitals in Shanghai from survey;case cost relationship functions were constructed using MATLAB,and Treatment Complexity Level(TCL)&Episode Clinical Complexity Score(ECCS)were computed;the quantified ECCS were classified into a decision tree using SPSS 24.0;the results were evaluated and examined using the Coefficient of Variation(CV),Reductio in Variance(RIV),and Kruskal-Wallis test.Results:CB1 were categorized as mildly complex(CV 0.65),moderately complex(CV 0.39),and severely complex(CV 0.30),RIV=0.61,P<0.01,which was in line with the requirement of the norms of independent grouping.Conclusion:On the basis of CB1 group,applying the ECC model with operation as independent variables can further reflect episode complexity level,improve the grouping performance,and better meet the needs of health insurance payment and performance evaluation.The proposed grouping scheme based on the results of the study has been adopted by the Municipal Health Insurance Bureau,providing a decision-making basis for local dynamic adjustment of DRGs grouping.
分 类 号:R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] F840.613[经济管理—保险]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.204.192