检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:伍洁洁 洪学智[2] 刘颖[1] 肖路阳 杨名赫 Wu Jiejie;Hong Xuezhi;Liu Ying(Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital,Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology/Hubei Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Infectious Diseases,Wuhan,430023,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉金银潭医院/湖北省传染病临床医学研究中心,武汉430023 [2]北京中医药大学管理学院,北京100029
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2024年第4期72-74,共3页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:北京市社会科学基金项目(18GLC052)。
摘 要:目的:探究三级公立医院绩效考核结果与政府财政补偿决策的相关性,为完善基于绩效导向的公立医院财政补偿机制提供参考。方法:编制透镜模型情景问卷,前瞻性检验公立医院绩效考核结果与财政补偿决策的相关性。结果:三级公立医院绩效考核与财政补偿决策之间呈现显著正相关,不同利益相关方决策一致性存在差异且对绩效考核结果敏感性不同。结论:三级公立医院绩效考核结果对财政补偿决策具有指导作用,但其应用尚未形成统一认识,需以相关制度进行保障。Objective:To explore the correlation between performance evaluation results of public hospitals and government financial compensation decisions,so as to provide empirical evidence and policy implementation references for improving performance-based public hospital financial compensation mechanism.Methods:The scenario questionnaire based on the Lens Model was prepared to prospectively test the relevance between the performance evaluation results of public hospitals and the decision-making of financial compensation.Results:There is a significant positive correlation between performance evaluation and financial compensation decisions in tertiary public hospitals,with differences in decision-making consistency among different stakeholders and varying sensitivities to performance evaluation results.Conclusion:Performance appraisal results of tertiary public hospitals play a guiding role in financial compensation decision-making,but there is no unified understanding of its application,which needs to be guaranteed by relevant systems.
分 类 号:R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] F224.5[经济管理—国民经济]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49