机构地区:[1]北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所胃肠肿瘤中心三病区,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,北京100142 [2]北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所放射治疗科,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,北京100142 [3]海军军医大学附属长海医院肛肠外科,上海200433 [4]复旦大学上海医学院附属肿瘤医院放射肿瘤科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海市放射肿瘤学重点实验室,上海200032 [5]中山大学肿瘤防治中心结直肠外科,广州510060 [6]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,北京协和医院基本外科,北京100730 [7]辽宁省肿瘤医院普通外科,沈阳110042 [8]吉林大学第一医院胃结直肠外科,长春130021 [9]青岛大学附属医院普外科,青岛266555 [10]云南省肿瘤医院结直肠外科,昆明650118 [11]消化系肿瘤整合防治全国重点实验室,恶性肿瘤转化研究北京市重点实验室,北京100142
出 处:《中华胃肠外科杂志》2024年第4期372-382,共11页Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2021YFF1201104);国家自然科学基金(82173156);扬帆计划-重点医学专业(ZYLX202116)。
摘 要:目的报告中国直肠癌患者新辅助治疗后等待观察后的远期结局。方法基于真实世界的多中心横断面研究。纳入新辅助治疗后评价为临床完全缓解(cCR)或近cCR(near-cCR)进行等待观察的直肠癌患者以及少数新辅助治疗后疗效较好、以活检为目的行局部切除确认ypCR的患者,随访时间需≥2年;剔除基线时伴有远处转移或带瘤生存自行等待观察的患者。根据以上标准,回顾性收集中国等待观察数据协作组(CWWD)中的数据信息,包括基本信息、新辅助治疗类型、治疗前影像学检查结果、新辅助治疗后疗效评价、补救措施及治疗结局等,分析本组患者新辅助治疗后等待观察后的远期结局,并比较cCR及near-cCR两组间的差异。结果来自8家医疗中心(北京大学肿瘤医院、复旦大学附属肿瘤医院、中山大学附属肿瘤医院、上海长海医院、北京协和医院、辽宁省肿瘤医院、吉林大学附属第一医院以及云南省肿瘤医院)共计318例接受等待观察且随访超过两年的直肠癌患者的临床资料。全组患者中男性221例(69.4%),女性107例(30.6%);中位年龄60(26~86)岁。肿瘤距离肛缘中位距离为3.4(0~10.4)cm。291例接受新辅助治疗后评效为cCR,27例评效为near-cCR。中位随访48.4(10.2~110.3)个月,5年累计总体生存率(OS)为92.4%(95%CI:86.8%~95.7%),5年累计疾病特异生存率(CSS)为96.6%(95%CI:92.2%~98.5%),5年累计器官保留研究校正无病生存率(OP-DFS)为86.6%(95%CI:81.0%~90.7%),5年累计器官保留率(OPR)为85.3%(95%CI:80.3%~89.1%),5年局部再生率为18.5%(95%CI:14.9%~20.8%),5年远处转移率为8.2%(95%CI:5.4%~12.5%)。全组共56例发生局部再生,82.1%(46/56)的局部再生发生于2年内,91.1%(51/56)的局部再生发生于3年内,中位再生时间为11.7(2.5~66.6)个月。91.1%(51/56)的局部再生发生于肠腔内。共23例患者发生远处转移,60.9%(14/23)远处转移发生于2年内,73.9%(17/23)发生于3年内,中位远处�Objective To report the long-term outcomes of Chinese rectal cancer patients after adopting a Watch and Wait(W&W)strategy following neoadjuvant therapy(NAT).Methods This multicenter,cross-sectional study was based on real-world data.The study cohort comprised rectal cancer patients who had achieved complete or near complete clinical responses(cCRs,near-cCRs)after NAT and were thereafter managed by a W&W approach,as well as a few patients who had achieved good responses after NAT and had then undergone local excision for confirmation of pathological complete response.All participants had been followed up for≥2 years.Patients with distant metastases at baseline or who opted for observation while living with the tumor were excluded.Data of eligible patients were retrospectively collected from the Chinese Wait-and-Watch Data Collaboration Group database.These included baseline characteristics,type of NAT,pre-treatment imaging results,evaluation of post-NAT efficacy,salvage measures,and treatment outcomes.We herein report the long-term outcomes of Chinese rectal cancer patients after NAT and W&W and the differences between the cCR and near-cCR groups.Results Clinical data of 318 rectal cancer patients who had undergone W&w for over 2 years and been followed up were collected from eight medical centers(Peking University Cancer Hospital,Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Shanghai Changhai Hospital,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Liaoning Cancer Hospital,the First Hospital of jilin University,and Yunnan Cancer Hospital.)The participants comprised 221 men(69.4%)and 107 women(30.6%)of median age 60(26-86)years.The median distance between tumor and anal verge was 3.4(0-10.4)cm.Of these patients,291 and 27 had achieved cCR or near-cCR,respectively,after NAT.The median duration of follow-up was 48.4(10.2-110.3)months.The 5-year cumulative overall survival rate was 92.4%(95%CI:86.8%-95.7%),5-year cumulative disease-specific survival(CsS)rate 96.6%(95%CI:92.2%-98.5%),5-year cumu
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...