证据法学视角下污染环境罪的主观罪过形式辨析  

Analysis of the Subjective Fault of Environmental Crimes from the Perspective of Evidence Law

作　　者：李会彬[1] LI Hui-bin(Institute of Comprehensive Governance,Beijing Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100101,China)

机构地区：[1]北京市社会科学院综合治理研究所,北京100101

出　　处：《山东行政学院学报》2024年第3期111-118,共8页Journal of Shandong Academy of Governance

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“传统刑事责任和民事责任关系的反思及其重新界定研究”(20BFX068)。

摘　　要：将污染环境罪的主观罪过形式认定为单一的故意或者过失的观点,会造成该罪的处罚间隙问题,也不符合司法实践中的实际情况。污染环境罪为双重罪过形式犯罪,故意和过失污染环境的行为均可构成污染环境罪。刑法之所以将污染环境罪设立为双重罪过形式犯罪,是为了解决该罪的主观要件的证明困难问题。双重罪过形式犯罪既降低了证明标准,也降低了法定刑,防止了轻罪重判,因此并不违背罪责刑相适应原则。The view that the subjective fault of environment crimes is a single form of intent or negligence will lead to loopholes in the punishment of this crime and does not conform to the actual situation in judicial practice.The subjective fault of environment crimes should be a crime with dual forms of subjective fault,which includes both intentional and negligent acts of polluting the environment.The criminal law establishes environment crimes as a crime with dual forms of subjective fault in order to solve the difficult problem of proving subjective elements.While lowering the standard of proof,the dual forms of subjective fault in environment crimes also reduce the legal punishment and prevent minor crimes from being heavily sentenced.Therefore,it does not violate the principle of making the punishment fit the crime.

关 键 词：证据法视角 污染环境罪 主观罪过形式 双重罪过 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]