检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕卫东 董全民[1] 孙彩彩 刘文亭 冯斌 刘玉祯 张振祥 杨晓霞 LYU Wei-dong;DONG Quan-min;SUN Cai-cai;LIU Weng-ting;FENG Bin;LIU Yu-zhen;ZHANG Zhen-xiang;YANG Xiao-xia(Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Science,Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Adaptive Management on Alpine Grassland,Key Laboratory of Alpine Grassland Ecosystem in the Three-River-Source(Qinghai University),Ministry of Education,Xining,Qinghai Province 810016,China)
机构地区:[1]青海大学畜牧兽医科学院,青海省高寒草地适应性管理重点实验室,三江源区高寒草地生态教育部重点实验室,青海西宁810016
出 处:《草地学报》2024年第5期1420-1428,共9页Acta Agrestia Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(U20A2007);国家自然基金地区科学基金项目(32160343);2021年度“西部之光”人才培养计划项目资助。
摘 要:放牧是青藏高原高寒草地最主要的利用方式,牦牛和藏羊是青藏高原最常见的放牧家畜,家畜通过采食植物地上部分会使地上生物量减少,进而对植物群落氮库产生影响。本研究依托青海省高寒草地-家畜系统适应性管理技术平台的放牧试验样地,探讨不同家畜类型放牧对高寒草地植物群落氮库的影响。研究结果表明:未放牧处理下高寒草地地上生物量为180.0 g·m^(-2),藏羊单独放牧显著降低了植物群落地上生物量。对未放牧处理下不同功能群氮素含量的研究发现:豆科植物(26.4 mg·g^(-1))>杂类草(17.0 mg·g^(-1))>禾草(12.9 mg·g^(-1))≈莎草(11.8 mg·g^(-1))。放牧显著增加了禾草和莎草氮含量,对杂类草氮含量影响较小。放牧对群落水平植物地上部分氮含量的影响变化小于对各功能群的变化影响,因为植物群落具有稳定性。当高寒草地植物群落处于放牧压力下,会从土壤中获取更多的氮以维持生长,放牧会进一步加剧青藏高原高寒草地植物生长的氮限制。Grazing is the predominant use way of alpine meadows in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau,with yaks and Tibetan sheep being the most common grazers.These livestock consume the aboveground portions of plants,leading to reduction in aboveground biomass and subsequently impact on plant community nitrogen pools.This study utilized grazing experimental sites within the Alpine-Grassland Livestock Adaptive Management Technology Platform to investigate the effects of different livestock types on nitrogen pools of alpine grassland communities.The results indicated that under no-grazing condition,alpine grassland aboveground biomass was 180.0 g·m^(-2).Tibetan sheep grazing significantly decreased the aboveground biomass of plant communities.In ungrazed treatment,nitrogen content among functional groups was the following order:Legumes(26.4 mg·g^(-1))>Forbs(17.0 mg·g^(-1))>Grass(12.9 mg·g^(-1))≈Sedge(11.8 mg·g^(-1)).Grazing significantly increased nitrogen content in grass and sedge,while had a smaller effect on forbs.The influence of grazing on nitrogen content of the community level was less pronounced than on individual functional groups,due to the inherent stability of plant communities.When subjected to grazing pressure,alpine grassland plant communities obtained more nitrogen from the soil to sustain growth,and grazing further exacerbated nitrogen limitation in these high-elevation ecosystems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.165.239