JBI循证卫生保健中心文本证据的质量评价清单  

Critical appraisal checklist for textual evidence developed by JBI Center of Evidence-Based Health Care

作　　者：周英凤[1] 胡雁[1] 朱政[1] 邢唯杰[1] 陈瑜[1] 顾莺[2] 张晓菊[3] 徐蕾 王安妮 ZHOU Yingfeng;HU Yan;ZHU Zheng;XING Weijie;CHEN Yu;GU Ying;ZHANG Xiaoju;XU Lei;WANG Anni(School of Nursing,Fudan University&Cooperation Centre for Joanna Briggs Evidence-Based Nursing of Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Children's Hospital Affiliate to Fudan University,Shanghai 201102,China;Tumor Hospital Affiliate to Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学护理学院复旦大学Joanna Briggs循证护理合作中心,上海200032 [2]复旦大学附属儿科医院,上海201102 [3]复旦大学附属肿瘤医院,上海200032

出　　处：《护士进修杂志》2024年第10期1075-1080,共6页Journal of Nurses Training

基　　金：复旦大学循证护理中心“循证护理全链条创新研究项目”(编号:FNDGJ202004)。

摘　　要：在缺乏高质量研究证据的情况下,经过严格地质量评价后的文本证据可作为医疗卫生保健决策依据的有效补充。本文旨在详细介绍JBI循证卫生保健中心3类文本证据(政策、专家意见及记叙)的质量评价清单,并通过实例分析对其核心内容进行详细解读,为国内研究人员评价文本证据的质量提供工具和支持。Objective Textual evidence after critical appraisal could be regarded as an effective supplement for decision-making in healthcare while the lack of high-quality research evidence.This article aimed to elaborately introduce the critical appraisal checklists for three types of textual evidence(including policy,specialist'opinion,and narrative)developed by JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center,and also explained its core content through the example analysis,so as to provide tools and support for the assessment of the quality of textual evidence for domestic researchers.

关 键 词：循证护理 文献质量评价 文本证据 政策 专家意见 记叙 

分 类 号：R471[医药卫生—护理学]