人类世的“美好”与“末世”之争:分歧、实质与回应  

The Debate on the the “Great” and “Apocalyptic” Aspects ofthe Anthropocene: Differences, Essence and Responses

作　　者：孟天昊 刘魁[1] MENG Tian-hao;LIU Kui(School of Marxism,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)

机构地区：[1]东南大学马克思主义学院,南京211189

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期135-142,共8页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“技术创新哲学与中国自主创新的实践逻辑研究”(19ZDA040)。

摘　　要：作为在理性启蒙运动和现代化进程中形成的社会运行图式,强调个体主体性意识、技术理性、资本逻辑以及社会历史宏大叙事的西方现代性隐含着人与人、人与自然的内在张力,而人类世境遇则表现为西方现代性的逻辑延伸和极化状态。鉴于此,面对西方现代性的人类世困境,生态现代主义和生态末日主义围绕着危机的根源、走向以及拯救方案展开了持续性争议。但是,双方都未能挖掘出困境背后的西方现代性原罪,并且各自的拯救方案也未能挣脱西方现代性的羁绊。因此,中国式现代化基于对“西方现代性神话”的反思和超越,提出了全球性生态危机治理的中国方案,从而让人类得以展望一种兼具反思性、建设性、开放性和全球性的全新世界图景。As a social framework that emerged during the rational Enlightenment and the process of modernization,Western modernity emphasises individual subjectivity,technological rationality,the logic of capital and the grand narrative of social history.However,Western modernity inherently contains tensions between humans and humans,as well as humans and nature.The Anthropocene is a logical extension and polarized state of Western modernity.In light of this,ecological modernism and ecological apocalypticism have sparked ongoing controversy regarding the origins,trajectory,and the solution to the crisis within the Anthropocene dilemma of Western modernity.However,both sides have failed to uncover the original sin of Western modernity behind the predicament,and their respective solutions have not been able to escape the constraints of Western modernity.Therefore,Chinese-style modernity,based on reflection and transcendence of the“myth of Western modernity”,proposes a Chinese solution for global ecological crisis governance.This allows humanity to envision a new world panorama that is reflective,constructive,open and global.

关 键 词：人类世境遇 西方现代性 生态现代主义 生态末日主义 中国式现代化 生态危机治理 

分 类 号：B82-058[哲学宗教—伦理学]