争议点理论的司法价值、应用及其限度  

The Judicial Value,Application and Limitations of the Dispute Point Theory

作　　者：彭中礼[1] PENG Zhong-li(Law School,Central South University,Changsha,Hunan 410012)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410012

出　　处：《公共治理研究》2024年第3期87-98,共12页PUBLIC GOVERNANCE RESEARCH

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国共产党司法政策百年发展史研究”(编号:21ZDA120)。

摘　　要：起源于古希腊法庭辩论实践的争议点理论既是司法论辩制度的理论升华,也是司法技术的具体延伸。就当事人而言,找准案件争议点可以促使当事人尽快熟悉司法问题而使得法庭论辩更具有针对性;就法官而言,确定案件争议点有利于聚焦问题并找到纠纷解决的有效方法;就司法而言,争议点理论强调对具体案件核心、关键问题进行有效争辩和对话,有利于事实澄清和法律的正确适用。作为一种实践性较强的理论既需要从法理上进行审视,也需要从实践操作当中予以重点关切。从司法应用以及具体案例中分析,争议点理论忽视了观点多元的可能性,实践过程中争议点的提出缺乏强制回应力,而且由于能力差异各方对争议点的理解也会有分歧。Originated from the practice of court debate in ancient Greece,the dispute point theory is not only the theoretical sublimation of judicial debate system,but also the concrete extension of judicial technology.As far as the parties are concerned,finding the dispute point of the case can promote the parties to get familiar with the judicial issues as soon as possible and make the court argument more targeted;As far as the judge is concerned,determining the point of dispute is conducive to focusing on the problem and finding an effective way to resolve the dispute;As far as the judiciary is concerned,the dispute point theory emphasizes the effective debate and dialogue on the core and key issues of specific cases,which is conducive to the clarification of facts and the correct application of the law.As a practical theory,it needs to be examined from the legal perspective and focus on the practical operation.From the analysis of judicial application and specific cases,the dispute point theory ignores the possibility of multiple viewpoints,the proposal of the dispute points in the practice process lacks coercive response stress,and the understanding of the dispute points will differ due to the difference of ability.

关 键 词：争议点理论 司法价值 司法应用 可能限度 

分 类 号：DF715[政治法律—诉讼法学]