平台用工中责任承担:现状、规制路径与反思  

Responsibility in Platform Employment:Current Situation,Regulation Path and Reflection

作　　者：阿依提江·哈力里 麦买提·乌斯曼[1] Ayitijiang·HALILI;Maimaiti·WUSIMAN(Law school,Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi Xinjiang,830052,China;Law School,Central University of Finance and Economics,Haidian Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]新疆农业大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830052 [2]中央财经大学法学院,北京海淀100081

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期83-90,共8页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“劳动合同履行障碍规则体系研究”(19BFX177)。

摘　　要：互联网平台用工中,一个平台从业者同时为多个用工主体提供劳动已不足为奇,这使平台用工中由谁承担用工责任成为焦点问题。理论界和司法裁判实践提出了坚持传统规制路径、扩大传统规制路径、创设新型规制路径等三个举措。传统规制路径是在劳动法现有规则下,审判机关面对急于处理的平台用工责任案件时采取的无奈举措;扩大传统规制路径存在一定的风险,若没有把握好扩大的范围,则会抑制劳动市场经济的发展;新型规制路径,即增设第三类劳动者与创设雇佣合同的举措,为由谁承担平台用工责任之难题的解决带来了希望。平台用工责任规制路径要适应用工模式的新变化,不断修订和完善,以更好解决平台用工责任问题。In the employment of Internet platforms,it is commonplace that a platform practitioner provides labor for multiple platforms at the same time,which makes it a focal issue who bears the employment responsibility in the employment.The theoretical circle and the judgment practice put forward the measures of sticking to the traditional regulations,expanding the traditional regulations and creating new regulations.Among them,the traditional regulation is the resigned choice by the judicial organs when dealing with urgent cases of platform employment liability under the existing rules of labor law;expanding tradi-tional regulations has certain risks and will restrain the development of labor market economy if the expansion is not confined to a proper scope;the new regulatory,the introduction of“third class of workers”and the establishment of“employment contract”,provides hope for solving the problem of determining the platform employment responsibility.But the new regulations need revisions and adaptation to the changes in the mode of employment for disputes over platform employment responsibility to be better solved.

关 键 词：平台用工 责任承担 平台从业者 第三类劳动者 雇佣合同 

分 类 号：D922.5[政治法律—民商法学]