“术”的边缘化:后五四时代古典文论研究的一个掠影  

The Marginalization of Shu:A Glimpse into Classical Literary Theory Research in the Post-May Fourth Era

作　　者：刘顺 LIU Shun(School of Literature,Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080,China)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学文学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《内蒙古民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期1-7,F0002,F0003,共9页Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University：Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科重大项目“守正以创造:古今中西之争与后五四时代建设性的中国文论研究”(项目编号:16JJD750016);黑龙江哲学社会科学研究规划项目“儒学转型及汉语演变与中晚唐文学之关系研究”(项目编号:23ZWB345)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：技术分析在古典文论研究中,是与其研究范围和领域、观念和方法以及其学科位置关联紧密的系统问题。五四文化所倡导的“科学”精神,并未在后五四时期的古典文论研究中得以充分体现。虽然“道”与“势”的优势更能尊重古典文论研究对象的前现代特性,也能在对学科分化有所反思的潮流之下,提供别样的参照,但无法回避的现实问题是“术”的边缘化,降低了古典文论研究的学术含量,并导致其无法有效而彻底地回应内部的问题,也难以为周边学科提供知识与方法等层面的有效支持。Technical analysis in classical literary theory research is a systematic issue deeply intertwined with its scope,con-cepts,methods,and disciplinary standing.Despite the scientific ethos championed by the May Fourth cultural movement,this spirit was not adequately manifested in the research of classical literary theory during the Post-May Fourth era.While the paradigms of Dao and Shi are more aligned with the pre-modern attributes of classical literary theory subjects,offering alternative perspectives amidst a trend of reflecting on disciplinary differentiation,the undeniable reality remains.The marginalization of Shu has notably diminished the scholarly substance of classical literary theory research.This marginalization impedes the field’s capacity to ad-dress internal challenges effectively and complicates its ability to furnish peripheral disciplines with robust methodological and knowledge-based support.

关 键 词：技术分析 后五四时期 古典文论 古今之争 

分 类 号：I206.09[文学—中国文学]