多次盗窃中“次”的行政不法与刑事不法之衔接判断  

The Judgment of Times on the Connection between Administrative Illegality and Criminal Illegality in Multiple Theft

作　　者：李星亿 LI XING-yi

机构地区：[1]江苏省宿迁市中级人民法院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2024年第2期14-22,共9页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

摘　　要：多次盗窃系行刑交叉立法范式,其正当性基础在于将客观立场与主观立场相结合的社会危害性理论。将犯罪停止形态融入次目的计量时,需注意仅有未遂形态的行政不法行为符合要求,中止与预备形态无需计量;基于未遂形态行政不法的纳入,应当承认多次盗窃的整体亦存有未遂停止形态。将连续犯理论融入次目的计量时,在兼具形式数罪、实质一罪的场域,次目的计量应坚持一罪立场;在连续犯的具体认定时应坚持限缩立场。将禁止重复评价原则融入次目的计量时,禁止重复评价原则系罪刑均衡原则的当然要求;但该原则并不等同于禁止二次评价,基于评价的非彻底性及全面性要求,存有法律明文规定的,仍可进行评价。Multiple theft is a cross-legislation paradigm of execution,and its legitimacy is based on the social harmfulness theory which combines objective and subjective positions.When integrating the form of cessation of crime into the measurement of sub-purposes,it should be noted that only the attempted form of administrative illegal act meets the requirements,and the form of suspension and preparation need not be measured.Based on the inclusion of the attempted form of administrative lawlessness,it should be admitted that the whole of multiple theft also has the attempted stop form.When the theory of continuous crime is integrated into the measurement of sub-purpose,the measurement of sub-purpose should adhere to the position of one crime in the field of both formal crime and actual crime.In the specific identification of continuous crime,we should adhere to the restrictive position.When the principle of prohibition of repeated evaluation is integrated into the measurement of sub-purposes,the principle of prohibition of repeated evaluation is the requirement of the principle of balance between crime and punishment.However,this principle is not equivalent to prohibiting secondary evaluation,and evaluation can still be carried out based on the non-thorough and comprehensive requirements of evaluation and the explicit provisions of the law.

关 键 词：次目 连续犯 多次盗窃 犯罪停止形态 禁止重复评价原则 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]