后真相时代主观程序正义及其程序改造  

Subjective Procedural Justice and Its Procedural Reform in the Post-truth Era

作　　者：李立景[1] 曲墨 LI Li-jing;Qu Mo

机构地区：[1]广西民族大学法学院 [2]广西民族大学民族法与区域治理研究协同创新中心

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2024年第2期23-32,共10页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：广西社科规划项目“融媒体ADR:基层社会矛盾纠纷媒介化多元协同治理研究”(20FXW007)。

摘　　要：后真相时代公民对正义的理解与主观息息相关,建立在法感情理论、知情意行的心理结构与情本体的中国人性格特点上的主观程序正义理论比客观程序正义理论更能应对时代挑战、符合中国国情。凭借主观程序正义的引入,程序正义理论能够得到非教条化的、人性化的重构。将主观程序正义具体应用到程序之中,应通过算法对主观程序正义标准动态把控,同时对程序交往进行人格化改造,对询问与陈述理念进行叙事治疗视角改造,重构司法传播之维使法官与当事人角色互视,并在司法社工协同机制中嵌入社会心理服务。最终在实现程序正义的同时,达成纠纷实质解决目的。In the post-truth era,citizens'understanding of justice is closely related to subjectivity.The subjective procedural justice theory,which is based on the theory of legal feelings,the psychological structure of understanding feelings and the character of Chinese people,is better able to meet the challenges of The Times and conform to China's national conditions than the objective procedural justice theory.With the introduction of subjective procedural justice,the theory of procedural justice can be reconstructed in a non-dogmatic and humanized way.In order to apply subjective procedural justice to procedures,we should use algorithms to dynamically control the criteria of subjective procedural justice,at the same time,personalize procedural communication,transform the concept of inquiry and presentation from the perspective of narrative therapy,reconstruct the dimension of judicial communication so that judges and parties see each other,and embed social psychological services in the collaborative mechanism of judicial social workers.In the end,it achieves the purpose of substantive dispute settlement while realizing procedural justice.

关 键 词：主观程序正义 后真相 法感情 知情意行 情本体 程序改造 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]