齐泽克—波德维尔之争再考察  

A Reexamination of the Controversy Between Slavoj Žižek and David Bordwell

作　　者：刘昕亭 Liu Xinting

机构地区：[1]中山大学中国语言文学系

出　　处：《电影艺术》2024年第3期41-48,共8页Film Art

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“主体介入与现实主义发展新阶段研究”(批准号:20BZW007)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：齐泽克和波德维尔的学术论争,常被归为“中等层面”与“宏大理论”的范式之争。两人确有分歧,但都反对相对主义,尤其是文化研究中的相对主义。对于波德维尔和“后理论”来说,相对主义拒绝真实的确定性,强调主体认同的多元性。齐泽克则质疑文化研究的反本质主义,悬置真与假的基本判断。齐泽克当年的质疑发展出“后电影”版本,如对连续剪辑、叙事功能的再讨论。“后电影”不是前述理论论争的消弭,而是其新挑战和再发展。The academic debate between SlavojŽižek and David Bordwell is often regarded as the paradigm debate between“middle-level”and“grand theory”.There are differences between the two scholars,but both oppose relativism,especially in cultural studies.For Bordwell and the“post theory”,relativism rejects the truth.Žižek questioned the anti-essentialism of cultural studies,which suspended the basic judgment of truth and falsehood.Žižek’s doubts developed a“post-cinema”version,such as the function of continuous editing and narration.“post cinema”is not the elimination of the above theoretical debates,but its new challenge and re-development.

关 键 词：波德维尔 齐泽克 后理论 后电影 认知主义 

分 类 号：J905[艺术—电影电视艺术]