《唐六典》所见唐前期宰相观念考论  

The Concept of Grand Councilor in the Early Tang Dynasty as seen in Tangliudian

作　　者：张耐冬[1] Zhang Naidong

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学国学院,北京100872

出　　处：《中国高校社会科学》2024年第3期138-146,M0006,共10页Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“《唐六典》疏证”(23&ZD171)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《唐六典》对宰相的论述可以视作唐前期宰相观念的集中反映。该观念继承了汉代以降“宰相概念制度化”的传统,强调宰相拥有的权力与地位附着于特定官职,实现宰相身份、宰相权力与职位之间的严格对应关系。因此,《唐六典》对唐代出现的差遣制宰相不予记载。同时,该书对唐代《职员令》未做规定的宰相职权与地位做出明确界定,并系于其认定的“宰相之职”名下。这种做法得到时人的认可,在中唐至北宋亦有重要影响。作为整体制度观念的组成部分,唐前期的宰相观念也反映了在政治体制转型时期对官僚制度传统与原有体制的乐观态度。The exposition of Grand Councilor(Zaixiang)in Tangliudian can be regarded as a concentrated reflection of the concept of Grand Councilor in the early Tang Dynasty,which inherited the tradition of"institutionalizing the concept of Grand Councilor"from Han Dynasty,emphasizing that the power and status are attached to specific official positions,so as to achieve a strict correspondence between the identity,power and the position.At the same time,Tangliudian clearly defines the power and status of Grand Councilor,which was not stipulated in the Tang Dynasty's Staff Order(Zhiyuanling),and puts them under"Grand Councilor's position".

关 键 词：《唐六典》 宰相观念 《职员令》 官僚制度 

分 类 号：K242[历史地理—历史学]