比较叙事学视域下《水浒传》的人物观  

The Character View of All Men Are Brothers in the Perspective of Comparative Narrative Science

作　　者：王杨菲 杨达涛 WANG Yangfei;YANG Datao(School of Liberal Arts,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui,241002,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学文学院,安徽芜湖241002

出　　处：《文化创新比较研究》2024年第14期1-4,8,共5页Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation

摘　　要：金圣叹在批评《水浒传》时较为明确地提出了小说人物塑造的成功标准,即小说艺术的核心就是要创作与众不同的特殊性格。他山之石可以攻玉,该文在比较叙事学视域下,对格雷马斯叙事理论中的功能性人物观与贯华堂本《水浒传》的人物观进行比较,对分析《水浒传》大有裨益。两种人物观的不同主要体现在两方面:一是对全书叙事脉络中人物安排的分析;二是在情节中对人物的展现。具体而言,结构与英雄人物的关系、英雄人物与女性人物在比较叙事学视域下都有不同的研究价值,因此运用叙事理论分析《水浒传》可为明清白话小说人物观的探讨提供借鉴。When criticizing All Men Are Brothers,Jin Shengtan clearly put forward the successful standard of the novel characterization,that is,the core of the novel art is to create a different special character.The stones of other mountains can attack jade.Under the perspective of narrative science,it is of great benefit to compare All Men Are Brothers of Guan characters in the western modern narrative theory.The difference of this character view is mainly reflected in two aspects:one is the analysis of the character arrangement in the narrative context of the book,and the other is the presentation of the characters in the plot.Specifically,the relationship between structure and heroes,heroes and female characters have different research values in the perspective of comparative narratology,so the analysis of narrative theory All Men Are Brothers may be helpful to explore the progressive significance of characters in Ming and Qing vernacular novels.

关 键 词：《水浒传》 叙事学 人物观 英雄人物 关系 成功标准 

分 类 号：I207.412[文学—中国文学]