民事执行权“侦查化”的内在逻辑与制度重塑  

The"Investigativeization"of Civil Execution Power:Internal Logic and Institutional Remodeling

作　　者：刘君博 Liu Junbo

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（诉讼法学、司法制度）》2023年第2期112-127,共16页Procedural Law And Judicial Systems

基　　金：北京市社科基金项目(21FXC017)“《民法典》实施背景下诉的主观合并制度研究”。

摘　　要：在“加强权能”与“强化监督”双重目标的塑造下,民事执行权在运行过程中呈现的“侦查化”演变趋势主要表现为责任财产调查的主动化与智能化、执行实施的警务化与信用惩戒的普遍化以及执行指挥中心的信息化与执行体制的垂直化。民事执行权的“侦查化”演进与“解决执行难”的话语变迁之间存在着复杂的互动关系。“侦查化”的民事执行权虽然强化了部分权能,但并未改变以执行法官为中心的执行实施微观权力运行机制,因此,执行体制垂直化改革并非民事执行权配置和监督的必然选择。立足于执行实施权力运行的司法权逻辑,“侦查化”的民事执行权应当通过功能性分权和司法规制实现其“合法性”基础的制度重塑。Under the shaping of the dual goals of“strengthening power”and“strengthening supervision”,the evolu⁃tion trend of"investigation"in the operation of civil enforcement power is mainly manifested in the active and intelligent in⁃vestigation of responsible property,and the policing of enforcement.The generalization of credit punishment and the infor⁃matization of the execution command center and the verticalization of the execution system.There is a complex interactive relationship between the evolution of"investigation"of civil enforcement power and the discourse change of“solving en⁃forcement difficulties”.Although the“investigative”civil enforcement power has strengthened some powers,it has not changed the micro-power operation mechanism of enforcement and enforcement centered on the enforcement judge.There⁃fore,the vertical reform of the enforcement system is not an inevitable choice for the allocation and supervision of civil en⁃forcement powers.Based on the logic of judicial power in the operation of executive power,the"investigation-oriented"civil enforcement power should be remodeled through functional decentralization and judicial regulation to achieve its“legit⁃imacy”basis.

关 键 词：民事执行权 侦查化 执行难 权力配置 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]