仲裁协议主观范围理论的重构  

Reconstruction of the Subjective Scope of Arbitration Agreement

作　　者：陈杭平[1] Chen Hangping

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（诉讼法学、司法制度）》2023年第8期141-157,共17页Procedural Law And Judicial Systems

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“民事判决效力体系性研究”(19BFX080)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：传统理论主张,仲裁协议只对明示同意的签署人有效,该主观范围理论已不合时宜。仲裁协议具有法律行为与诉讼行为的双重性质。法定“书面方式”概念极具延展性,不会对仲裁协议主观范围扩张造成实质障碍。意思表示解释二元论及程序选择理论,为仲裁协议约束非签署人奠定了理论基础。在单一合同关系下,非签署人可因添加或变更而受合同所含仲裁协议的约束。在多个合同关系下,基础合同的仲裁协议可对关联性合同的当事人有效。应基于有明示的从明示、无明示的准推断(推测、视为)之路径,重构仲裁协议主观范围理论,使之更加包容、开放以满足复杂仲裁的实践需求。Traditional theory,which maintains that an arbitration agreement is only valid for the signatories who have explicitly agreed to it,is no longer appropriate today.An arbitration agreement has the dual nature of a legal act and a litigation act.The concept of"written form"as defined by Chinese Arbitration Law is highly extensible and will not pose a substantial obstacle to the expansion of the subjective scope of arbitration agreements.The dualism theory on the interpretation of the declaration of intention and the theory of procedural choice lays a theoretical foundation for an arbitration agreement to bind non-signatories.In a single contract,non-signatories may be bound by the arbitration agreement contained in the contract due to the addition or modification of the parties to the contract.In multiple con-tracts with interrelationship,the arbitration agreement of the underlying contract may be valid for the parties involved in the affiliated contracts.It is necessary to reconstruct the theory on the subjective scope of arbitration agreements according to the principle of deferring to express stipulation,or otherwise to the presumption from implied stipulation,so as to make it more inclusive and open and meet the practical needs of complex arbitration.

关 键 词：仲裁协议 主观范围 意思表示 书面方式 程序选择 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]