从一起贪污案看间接正犯的实务认定  

On the Practical Identification of Indirect Principal Offenders From a Corruption Case

作　　者：李自刚 LI Zi-gang(Beijing Dacheng(Harbin)Law Firm,Harbin 150086,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大成(哈尔滨)律师事务所,黑龙江哈尔滨150086

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2024年第5期65-67,共3页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：在共同实施犯罪行为的情况下,司法实践往往会根据“部分行为全部责任”理论一并按照《刑法》第26条的规定进行量刑处罚,而对于共同犯罪中是否存在间接正犯的问题在现实中却少有剥离和区分,导致判决罪责刑不相适应的情况时有发生。根据刑法的间接正犯理论,在利用者与被利用者共同参与的情况下,利用者利用被利用者的错误认识完成构成要件行为,被利用者存在事实认识错误,对利用者应认定为间接正犯。In the case of jointly committing criminal acts,judicial practice often applies the theory of“partial responsibility for all acts”to sentencing and punishment in accordance with Article 26 of“The Criminal Law”.However,in reality,there is little separation and distinction between whether there is an indirect principal offender in a joint crime,resulting in situations where the judgment of crime,responsibility,and punishment is not appropriate.According to the theory of indirect principal offender in criminal law,in the case of joint participation between the user and the exploited,if the exploited uses the wrong understanding of the user to complete the constitutive behavior,and the user has a factual understanding error,the user should be recognized as an indirect principal offender.

关 键 词：共同犯罪 部分行为全部责任 事实认识错误 间接正犯 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]