康有为“三世说”对董子《春秋》学之阐发  

The Interpretation of Dongzi’s Commentary on The Spring and Autumn Annals in Kang Youwei’s“Idea of Three Kinds of Times”

作　　者：杨济襄[1] YANG Jixiang(Department of Chinese,Sun Yat-sen University,Kaohsiung,Taiwan 80402,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学中文系,中国台湾高雄80402

出　　处：《衡水学院学报》2024年第3期20-27,43,共9页Journal of Hengshui University

摘　　要：康有为在戊戌政变游走海外后,对公羊学里所主张之“三世”说有了新的阐释。他不从“事与文”来解经,而从董子“《春秋》无达辞,以义为尚”去发挥《春秋》大义,对《礼记》谓《春秋》之教为“属辞比事”不以为然。康有为以孔子之仁为核心,畅论三世之变,不拘泥于“事与文”之解经方式,而落实在仁治的文明进化。在西汉董仲舒、东汉何休二人不同的解经路线上,康有为无疑倾向于董仲舒。聚焦于康有为的三世新诠与董子《春秋》学之关联,厘清康有为“三世说”的特殊见解与相关争议。After the Reform Movement of 1898,Kang Youwei travelled overseas and gave a new interpretation to the“idea of three kinds of times”advocated by Gongyang School.He didn’t interpret the classics from“narration and diction”,but interpreted the deep meaning of The Spring and Autumn Annals from Dong Zi’s ideas that“There is no words that are suitable for everything in The Spring and Autumn Annals and that meaning is valued highly”,and he didn’t agree that The Book of Rites regarded“zhu ci bi shi”(being good at diction and narration)as the teaching result of The Spring and Autumn Annals.Kang Youwei,with Confucius’benevolence as the core,discussed the changes about the three kinds of times,not rigidly adhering to the way of interpreting classics through“narration and diction”,but implementing the civilization development of benevolence governance.There is no doubt that Kang Youwei is inclined to Dong Zhongshu in the different ways of interpreting Confucian classics between Dong Zhongshu in the Western Han Dynasty and He Xiu in the Eastern Han Dynasty.This paper focuses on the relationship between Kang Youwei’s new interpretation of the idea of three kinds of times and Dongzi’s commentary on The Spring and Autumn Annals,and clarifies Kang Youwei’s special views on the“idea of three kinds of times”as well as the related disputes.

关 键 词：董仲舒 康有为 三世说 公羊学 《春秋》 

分 类 号：B234.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]