检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐百永 Xu Baiyong(Institute for Western Frontier Region of China,Shaanxi Normal University,710062)
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学中国西部边疆研究院,陕西西安710062
出 处:《中国历史地理论丛》2024年第2期80-89,共10页Journal of Chinese Historical Geography
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国共产党在西藏建构国家认同与铸牢中华民族共同体意识研究(1950-1965)”(23BDJ089);陕西师范大学“一带一路”专项科研项目“高原丝绸之路上的汉藏经济文化交流”(22YDYLZ015)。
摘 要:古代中国内地士人在描述和书写边疆、边远区域时多使用“绝域”“蛮荒”等词,吐蕃及其后西藏均被纳入这一话语体系。唐代以来,内地士人对活跃于青藏高原族群的认知逐渐发生变化,使得西藏逐渐脱离“绝域”的总体认知。在被纳入中央王朝统治版图后,内地士人有关西藏的文本书写内容更加丰富而多元。这与西藏宗教有关的内容日渐增多并占据更为突出的地位有关。西藏从“绝域”到“版图”的认知演变历程,体现了西藏逐渐与内地融为一体的发展脉络,反映了西藏社会演进和发展逐渐融入中华民族共同体的发展格局。In ancient China,the mainland scholars used simple and general terms such as Remote Place and Uncivilized Region to describe and write about the frontier and remote regions.These terms also used to describe the general perception of Tubo and Tibet after the Tubo period.Since the Tang Dynasty,the percep-tion of the ethnic groups activated on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau had gradually undergone a marked change,resulting in the gradual removal of Tibet from the general perception of Remote Place.After Tibet was incor-porated into the ruling territory of the central dynasty,the textual writing about Tibet of the Inland Scholars became richer and more diverse.General social knowledge continued to be inherited and disseminated,and the content related to Tibetan religion grew and occupied a more prominent position.In the history of the de-velopment of the Chinese Nation,the evolution of the perception of Tibet from Remote Place to Territory re-flects the Tibet gradually integrated with the inland,and the Tibetan social evolution and development gradu-ally integrated into the pattern of the development of the Chinese National Community.
分 类 号:K928[历史地理—人文地理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49